Ruias, Khaitans likely to appear in 2G special court today

January 27, 2012 11:40 am | Updated October 18, 2016 02:45 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

Five persons, including two members of the family that controls multi-billion dollar conglomerate Essar Group, and three telecom companies who were charge-sheeted on December 12 last by the Central Bureau of Investigation in the 2G spectrum scam case are scheduled to appear before the special court hearing the case on Friday.

While taking cognisance of the CBI's second supplementary charge sheet in the case on December 21, Special Judge O. P. Saini had issued summons to Essar Group promoters Ravikant and Anshuman Ruia, Loop Telecom promoters Kiran and I. P. Khaitan, and Essar Group Director (Strategy and Planning) Vikash Saraf, besides three telecom companies — Loop Telecom Private Limited, Loop Mobile India Limited, and Essar TeleHoldings Limited — to appear in court on January 27 to answer the charges brought against them by the CBI.

The CBI has charged all the eight accused with criminal conspiracy (Indian Penal Code Section 120B) to cheat (IPC Section 420) the Department of Telecommunications by setting up Loop Telecom as a front company in violation of existing norms, to illegally obtain additional spectrum, despite having substantial stake in Vodafone Essar. In a statement, the Essar Group has denied all charges.

Clause-8 of the DoT's Unified Access Service Licence (UASL) guidelines prevents existing UAS licence holding promoter companies from owning over 10 per cent equity holding in another licencee company in the same service area.

The accused persons had challenged the special court order in the Delhi High Court arguing that Mr. Saini could not hear the charges against them as they had not been charge-sheeted under the Prevention of Corruption Act. They had contended that the charges against them were triable by the court of a Metropolitan Magistrate court. But the High Court on January 24 directed the appellants to approach the Supreme Court to seek clarification on whether the High Court could hear the matter challenging the special court's order.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.