HC upholds sacking of cop for bigamy

Head constable was dismissed from service in 1998 after departmental enquiry

January 02, 2018 01:28 am | Updated 02:47 pm IST - New Delhi

Terming it a gross misconduct that is “most unbecoming of a member of a disciplined force”, the Delhi High Court has upheld the dismissal of a Delhi Police head constable for entering into a second marriage without divorcing his first wife.

A Bench of Justice Rekha Palli and Justice Hima Kohli refused to entertain the plea of the man challenging his dismissal from service for entering into a second marriage with a woman constable without seeking legal divorce from his first wife, a head constable.

The man had urged the HC that even if the charge of entering into a second marriage was proved the penalty imposed on him was ‘extremely harsh’. He said that the ‘extreme punishment’ of dismissal ought to be inflicted only on a grave misconduct and not in a case involving charges of bigamy.

Dinesh Kumar entered the Delhi Police as a constable in 1987. Two years later he was promoted to head constable. He had solemnised his first marriage with a fellow head constable in 1989. A male child was born out of this wedlock in 1990.

He then went on to marry another fellow woman constable in 1996 without seeking legal divorce from his first wife.

A departmental enquiry was initiated against him by the force, which found him guilty of bigamy and dismissed him from service in 1998. The Delhi Police had said that bigamy was a misconduct under Rule 21(2) of the Conduct Rules.

Challenged order

Kumar went on to challenge the penalty order and argued that the ‘quantum of punishment’ given to him was not proportionate to the offence. He said that the misconduct of bigamy had nothing to do with the discharge of official duties.

But his appeal against his dismissal was rejected by the Disciplinary Authority of the force and later by the Central Administrative Tribunal. Finally, he moved the High Court last year.

‘Most unbecoming’

“We are of the view that the misconduct committed by the petitioner is most unbecoming of a member of a disciplined force,” the court stated while dismissing his plea.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.