Delhi HC refuses to give interim protection to AAP MLAs

The court was displeased by the MLAs’ conduct of telling the poll panel not to go ahead with the matter as the issue has been challenged in the high court.

January 19, 2018 08:45 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 08:12 am IST - New Delhi

AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj addresses media the at AAP party office, in New Delhi on Friday.

AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj addresses media the at AAP party office, in New Delhi on Friday.

The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to pass any interim order of protection to AAP MLAs, whose names have been recommended for disqualification as legislators by the Election Commission of India (ECI) for holding office of profit.

Justice Rekha Palli asked the Election Commission to inform it by January 22 whether it has sent any communication to President Ram Nath Kovind for disqualifying the 20 MLAs.

The court said it was not inclined to give any interim relief to the legislators as they had not cooperated with the election commission in its proceedings on the issue taking shield of the fact that their pleas were pending in the high court.

“This court has not granted you stay but you go and tell EC not to proceed…When your conduct is such that you don’t go to EC just because your case is pending before the high court, I am not inclined to pass any interim order,” the court remarked.

While the EC has been hearing the office of profit case, the AAP legislators had used the September 2016 verdict of the high court scrapping the appointment of the parliamentary secretaries in its defence.

In August last year, the High Court had sought response of the commission on AAP MLAs plea against the poll panel's decision to continue hearing a complaint against them for allegedly holding office of profit.

A counsel appearing for the AAP legislator contended before the court that the poll panel has not responded to the petition till date. He further claimed that the poll panel has not given them a hearing before arriving at the decision.

“There are 20 people involved in it. How can you take it so lightly. Why don’t you file your reply,” the court asked.

The election commission said it will submit its response within two weeks on the petition which is pending since August last year.

The court has listed the case for further hearing on January 22.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.