China flays US over pipe duties

November 06, 2009 04:18 pm | Updated 04:23 pm IST - BEIJING

In this September 24 file photo, Benjamin Yeung, second from left, arrives at Jack Edwards Airport in Gulf Shores, Ala. Yeung is plotting a comeback as a hybrid car maker in the U.S. - a venture requiring billions of dollars that could face daunting odds amid a weak economy and against competitors such as Toyota and Honda that have already invested millions in "green" technology. Photo: AP.

In this September 24 file photo, Benjamin Yeung, second from left, arrives at Jack Edwards Airport in Gulf Shores, Ala. Yeung is plotting a comeback as a hybrid car maker in the U.S. - a venture requiring billions of dollars that could face daunting odds amid a weak economy and against competitors such as Toyota and Honda that have already invested millions in "green" technology. Photo: AP.

China criticized Washington for imposing anti-dumping duties on Chinese-made steel pipes and launched a probe on Friday of imported U.S. autos, adding to trade tensions two weeks before President Barack Obama visits Beijing.

The latest moves ratchet up disputes over market access for goods from poultry and tires to Hollywood movies. But Beijing and Washington are confining the conflicts to diplomatic channels, apparently hoping to avert a trade war that could damage wide-ranging cooperation on issues such as the global economic crisis, North Korea and climate change.

The Commerce Ministry criticized the U.S. decision on Thursday to raise tariffs on Chinese pipes as protectionist. It said the move violated World Trade Organization principles and commitments by Washington and other Group of 20 major economies to avoid protectionism amid the global economic crisis.

“China resolutely opposes use of such protectionist practices, and will take measures to protect the interests of domestic industry,” ministry spokesman Yao Jian, said in a statement on the ministry’s Web site.

The U.S. Commerce Department said it concluded Chinese producers were dumping pipes used by the oil and gas industry and would impose duties of up to 99 percent.

Yi Xiaozhun, a deputy commerce minister, said the case was the biggest anti—dumping action yet against China by market value and affected exports worth $3.2 billion a year.

Also on Friday, Beijing announced it was launching an anti-dumping investigation of imported U.S. autos. It said it was acting on a complaint by Chinese automakers but gave no details of the alleged American misconduct. The case could result in higher tariffs on U.S. autos if Chinese investigators conclude American automakers received improper subsidies or sold below fair-market price.

Beijing warned Washington at trade talks last month of the impending probe, a possible diplomatic gesture to reduce the political impact of Friday’s announcement.

The disputes come as Mr. Obama is due to arrive November 15 on his first president visit to Beijing. Both governments have repeatedly stressed the importance of stable relations and senior leaders have avoided public comments about the trade disputes.

Beijing and Washington are especially eager to avoid any irritants that might derail relations as they work together with other major governments to try to pull the global economy out of its worst downturn since the 1930s.

Both governments have stuck to the dispute-resolution process laid out in WTO agreements.

In August, Beijing backed down in a dispute over auto parts and altered its import tariffs after it lost an appeal of a WTO case brought by the United States, Europe and Canada that said it treated foreign suppliers unfairly.

On Wednesday, the United States joined Europe and Mexico in asking the WTO to investigate Chinese curbs on exports of bauxite and other industrial raw materials. Beijing says it must rein in mining to protect the environment, but Washington and others say the curbs improperly give Chinese companies favourable access to some materials.

Yi, the commerce minister, repeated Chinese complaints that Washington treats China as a non-market economy. He called that status a Cold War relic and said Beijing hopes it is soon repealed.

“The ‘market economy status’ is the core of this case. An important reason why the U.S. verdict is so unfavourable to us is that it used double standards rather than the WTO standard that commonly applied by other countries,” Mr. Yi said. “That’s why our companies are treated unfairly and unequally. China is very dissatisfied.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.