The Saturday Interview — Agent of change

Habib Faisal's stories are rooted in the Indian middle-class. The writer-director who has quietly been shifting the focus of films to the country's dusty heartland

June 15, 2012 05:00 pm | Updated November 13, 2021 10:18 am IST

mailpix

mailpix

There are filmmakers who take pride in working outside the system. And there are those who are quietly changing the system from within.

Within half a decade, the writer of ‘ Salaam Namaste , ' ‘ Jhoom Barabar Jhoom , ,' ‘ Ta Ra Rum Pum , ,' ‘ Band Baaja Baaraat ' and ‘ Ladies versus Ricky Bahl ,' has slowly and steadily , managed to steer a mammoth ship from picturesque foreign waters back to the dusty heartland of India.

Writer-director Habib Faisal, who made the recent box-office winner ‘ Ishaqzaade ' and the critically acclaimed ‘ Do Dooni Chaar ' tells us how he managed to find his voice with stories rooted in the Indian middle-class, by working with the system.

What do you find more satisfying — critical acclaim or box-office success?

I have never made films for critics or festivals. I think reviewers should understand that the intent of a Housefull 2 or Rowdy Rathore is different from the intent of an Ishaqzaade or a Paan Singh Tomar or a Vicky Donor . If I have been able to communicate to the aam aadmi that ‘listen, there's a possibility of a Parma and Zoya falling in love' or if someone makes a film such as Paan Singh Tomar about the plight of sportsmen in this country, the idea becomes bigger than the film itself. How that idea is shot and edited is a matter of taste, and that may not work for everyone. The numbers or box-office figures are not a dirty thing. KahaaniDirty Picture Yes, the Rowdy Rathore s will happen, but I am glad that Kahaani , Paan Singh Tomar and Vicky Donor have also happened and translated to numbers. There's room for both. If a film has a certain humility towards the audience, its intelligence and its need for entertainment, it will work. Amar Akbar Antony

You said that Zoya in Ishaqzaade is a strong character given her social context when some critics called it regressive. How do you manage to make sure you write strong roles for women?

I don't set out to write feminist films. I like to give the players involved an equal footing and the same amount of strengths and human flaws so that the drama can be interesting. It does not have anything to do with gender. I don't consciously decide to write strong women characters. They just end up being strong, maybe because the women around me have always been strong and they find their way into these characters. In Ishaqzaade , Zoya comes from a small town where women are brutalised and within her kind of space, she reacts to that in her own way. She's strong given that milieu.

How did you manage to convince a production house that was happy making films in foreign locations to move back home with Band Baaja Baarat or Ishaqzaade ?

What has changed is the way the audiences are reacting to films. Therefore, a production house such as Yash Raj Films also improvises and reinvents itself. I enjoy the same respect as I enjoyed even when working on Salaam Namaste . Since Aditya Chopra is a writer, even if a film bombs he knows there are N number of factors that go into making a film work or not work. What's changed is not YRF, what's changed is how the media has given recognition to the writer. We need to demystify this further. How many reviews talk about production designers even today?

Your films seem to be decidedly steeped in the local dialect

It came instinctively; I wanted to hear characters talk a language that is human. I didn't like to watch films that have stock phrases that we have heard in so many films.

You seem to find the Indian middle class fascinating

All those films happened instinctively. Maybe because it has to do primarily with how one has grown up and has seen closely or grew up watching films that reflected that middle class reality. Be it Golmaal or Chupke Chupke or even action films such as Deewar or Amar Akbar Antony , they all reflected a certain reality and entertained. In the 1990s and the early 2000s, everybody wanted to remake Hollywood romantic comedies or make a Hindi ‘Friends' where all characters were a variant of Ross or Rachel or Monica or Chandler. At least now we are only borrowing our own narrative from the South.

How do you define realism in a canvas meant to be larger than life?

The real is the motive of the character. When that motive leads to an action, that action can stick to the larger-than-life canvas... That's what I love about Manmohan Desai's Amar Akbar Antony . A simple, macho man who is beaten up, his machismo bruised, stands in front of the mirror, so drunk that he becomes his own doppelganger and it works at a bizarre level... Yet, the motive is real and larger than life.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.