Full of energy

Though the overdone arudis and araimandi marred the sheen of dignity, there were unusual pieces deftly executed by Janaki Rangarajan.

March 02, 2012 03:06 pm | Updated 03:07 pm IST

Janaki Rangarajan. Photo: B. Koushik

Janaki Rangarajan. Photo: B. Koushik

Janaki Rangarajan, a disciple of Padma Subrahmanyam who is on her own, has evolved an eclectic style of Bharatanrityam. Added to the basic grammar of Bharatanatyam are karanas from her guru's research, geometry from perhaps the Kalakshetra influence and an efficient and no-nonsense approach all her own. The resulting style is a unique statement that Janaki makes with confidence.

There is however a caveat here. The confidence sometimes overdone, translated into certain unflattering mannerisms- the over-acting and affectation in the arudis in the varnam (‘Roopamu Joochi,' Thodi, Adi, composed by Tiruvarur Muthuswami Nattuvanar as a tana varnam and modified into a pada varnam by Tiger Varadachariar) and the overdone ‘araimandi' stance that went way beyond the aesthetic standard and took away from the merit of the presentations.

With the support from musical stalwarts in the orchestra, Janaki's recital was full of energy. The pieces were well-rehearsed and impressive, but it was in the padam ‘Thottu Thottu Pesa Varan' (Behag, Periasami Thooran) that her maturity came through in its full glory. A young heroine is embarrassed by Krishna's advances and complains that there is no one to rein in his wanton behaviour. The heroine does an about turn towards the end of the song, when she admits to having a soft spot for him. The transition from an indignant girl to a coy maiden was sensitively portrayed.

Dignified portrayal

The other padam, ‘Netrandhi Nerattile' (Husseini, Subbarama Iyer) about a heroine who questions her man, Subramanya, about the woman he was with the previous day, was also a dignified portrayal. The two songs drew the best of the melodists. The varnam on the other hand did not have the sheen of dignity, marred as it was by Janaki's overdone arudis and araimandi and ill-timed thattu-mettu sequences. The opening Chokkanathar Kavuthuvam (Ghanapanchaka ragas, misra chapu, Gangai Muthu Nattuvanar) and the closing Hamsanandi tillana (Adi, Padma Subrahmanyam, Subramanya Bharati poetry in sahitya) were unusual choices, deftly executed.

The supporting stalwarts were: K. Hariprasad (vocal), Kandadevi S. Vijayaraghavan (violin), Jayashree Ramanathan (nattuvangam) and Vedakrishnaram (mridangam).

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.