None of us are pure: Susi Ganeshan

As Thiruttu Payale 2 gets ready to release, the director takes us through the process of writing flawed characters and what really happened to Kanthaswamy

November 27, 2017 03:52 pm | Updated November 28, 2017 04:26 pm IST

“Everyone lies,” says Susi Ganeshan, explaining the process of writing inherently-flawed characters for his films Thiruttu Payale and its sequel, which releases this Thursday. “Even if you record your own phone calls and listen to it at the end of day, you’d notice how many times we fib, even if it’s harmless. None of us are pure.”

So he looks around for inspiration to write his characters which become relatable to the audience not because they’re ‘cardboard characters filled with virtue’, but because ‘they’re a lot like us.’ Either way, he says, “It’s boring to write about good people.”

That’s why he stuck to the title for the sequel as well. Thiruttu Payale , which roughly translates to scoundrel, isn’t just a title to refer to the film’s lead character. “Everyone in these films is a ‘Thiruttu Payal’. If you notice the first film closely, you’ll realise that the same background score has been used for all characters.”

It’s a format he has taken forward to the sequel as well. “It’s finding that right shade of grey that’s difficult. The audience should feel that they too would have done the same if put in a similar situation. Their actions may be wrong but not wrong enough that they become unforgivable.”

But Ganeshan admits that making the sequel to a successful film is always stressful. Apart from the pressure of having to repeat the success of the first part, Ganeshan feels that when a director gets ready to make a sequel, “it’s as though he knows what worked in the first film as well. Nobody really knows why a film works and why one doesn’t.”

So what he can do is try to retain the essence of the first film in a new and contemporary setting. “The content needs to be fresh but somewhere it has to also take one back to the first part. It’s a tricky balance.” And while the first part’s shock value was what worked in its favour, he says that in a post social media world, shocking the audience is a tough task. “In the first film, we had a kissing scene and that went on to create a massive impact for the kind of film it was then. But such a scene would mean nothing today. We have to raise the bar; wouldn’t a lip-lock seem outdated now?”

But a sequel wasn’t always in the works. “In fact, given how demonetisation has affected all of us, a sequel to Kanthaswamy would have been more timely,” he adds.

“It’s a film that spoke about black money even before the media had. It was ahead of its time. I agree that the film was much longer than we’d wanted it to be but it is a film I’m still proud of.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.