Court denies bid for new trial in Michael Jackson’s AEG case

January 31, 2015 11:42 am | Updated November 28, 2021 09:05 pm IST - Los Angeles

Michael Jackson in this March 5, 2009 file photo.

Michael Jackson in this March 5, 2009 file photo.

California’s Court of Appeals ruled that Michael Jackson’s family did not have standing for a new trial in a negligence case against AEG Live.

The family lost their attempt to reverse a jury’s decision in 2013 that concert promoter AEG Live is not responsible for the singer’s death, reported Ace Showbiz.

In the lawsuit filed in 2010 by Michael’s mother Katherine Jackson, the family was seeking USD 1.5 billion in damages.

The family claimed AEG Live had negligently hired Dr Conrad Murray, who was convicted of involuntary manslaughter for giving Michael the anaesthetic that led to his death.

“AEG hired Dr Conrad Murray as Michael’s personal physician for a concert tour. Michael died of acute propofol intoxication while under Dr Murray’s care,” the lawsuit stated.

However, the appellate court disagreed, maintaining the jury’s decision in 2013. “AEG did not owe Michael a duty to refrain from exerting pressure over Dr Murray, AEG did not undertake to provide protective services to Michael and AEG owed Michael no duty arising out of the contract with Dr Murray,” the appeal read.

“The undisputed facts establish that Dr Murray was an independent contractor as a matter of law, AEG is not liable under the peculiar risk doctrine as an independent contractor and Dr Murray is not an agent of AEG.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.