Goldman Sachs rakes in $3 billion in quarterly profits 

April 20, 2010 06:56 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 08:44 pm IST - Washington DC

People walk to work outside the Goldman Sachs headquarters in New York. The company announced a huge profit in the forst quarter even as it faces investigations into alleged civil fraud. Photo: AP

People walk to work outside the Goldman Sachs headquarters in New York. The company announced a huge profit in the forst quarter even as it faces investigations into alleged civil fraud. Photo: AP

Investment bank Goldman Sachs on Tuesday announced profit of $3.46 billion for the first quarter (January-March) of 2010, even as it faced a double embarrassment of the U.K. market regulator joining the United States' Securities and Exchange Commission in announcing fraud investigations into the firm's activities.

Goldman Sach's first quarter performance came on the back of net revenues of $12.78 billion with an annualised return on equity of 20.1 per cent for the quarter. The bottom line was boosted by especially strong performance in the bank's fixed income, commodities and currency division, which generated quarterly net revenues of $7.39 billion.

While Goldman noted that compensation and benefits — including bonuses — to its staff had dropped to 43 per cent of net revenues for the quarter, down from 50 per cent a year ago, it still left its staff with a combined pay package of $5.49 billion, or about $169,000 on an average per employee.

The firm's stellar performance, in the face of continuing economic woes in the U.S., came shortly after the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority announced that “Following preliminary investigations the FSA has decided to commence a formal enforcement investigation into Goldman Sachs International in relation to recent SEC allegations.”

The regulator added that it would be liaising closely with the SEC in this review.

Last week the SEC announced that it had charged Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents, Fabrice Tourre, for “defrauding investors by misstating and omitting key facts about a financial product tied to subprime mortgages,” even as the U.S. housing market began to collapse.

The regulator had alleged that when Goldman Sachs structured and marketed a synthetic collateralised debt obligation (CDO) whose value was based on the performance of subprime security it did not disclose to investors the fact that Paulson and Company — a major hedge fund that had bet against CDO — played a key role in the decision to include that CDO in investors' portfolios.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.