Rating agencies: thresholds on cross-holdings mooted

SEBI eyes mitigating concerns regarding conflict of interest

September 09, 2017 08:37 pm | Updated 08:37 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Birds rest on the logo of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), India's market regulator, installed on the facade of its head office building in Mumbai, India, in this July 13, 2015 file photo. India will crack down on errant financial firms that raise funds, mainly from millions of rural poor customers, through loosely regulated credit cooperative societies, a senior official in the agriculture ministry said. REUTERS/Shailesh Andrade/Files

Birds rest on the logo of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), India's market regulator, installed on the facade of its head office building in Mumbai, India, in this July 13, 2015 file photo. India will crack down on errant financial firms that raise funds, mainly from millions of rural poor customers, through loosely regulated credit cooperative societies, a senior official in the agriculture ministry said. REUTERS/Shailesh Andrade/Files

SEBI has proposed a 10% cap in cross-shareholding among credit rating agencies along with a slew of measures for tightening the financial and operational eligibility of their promoters.

Besides, the regulator has suggested greater disclosure requirements by credit rating agencies (CRAs) as well as by companies getting their services, according to a consultation paper.

The proposed norms are likely to have an impact on global rating agencies like S&P, Moody’s and Fitch which have significant holdings in domestic agencies besides their direct presence.

In a significant move, the regulator has proposed that no CRA should “directly or indirectly, hold more than 10% of shareholding and/ or voting rights in another CRA and shall not have representation on the board of the other CRA.”

‘Prior approval needed’

Further, SEBI’s prior approval would be needed for acquisition of shares or voting rights in a CRA that results in change in control.

“A shareholder holding 10% or more shares and/ or voting rights in a registered CRA shall not hold 10% or more shares and/ or voting rights, directly or indirectly, in any other CRA,” it noted.

The requirement would not apply to holdings by broad-based domestic financial institutions.

“Having some thresholds on cross-holding in CRAs may mitigate concerns regarding conflict of interest, independence of operations, etc,” the paper said.

Issuing the consultation paper, the watchdog said the objective was to seek views from the public on the proposals that are expected to improve market efficiency and enhance the accountability as well as functioning of these agencies.

The consultation paper would be open for public comments till September 29.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.