EU investigates Amazon's tax practice

October 07, 2014 05:56 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:32 am IST - BRUSSELS

Multinational online giant Amazon is being investigated by the Competition Commission of European Union for its tax practices in the zone. A file photo of the logo of Amazon.

Multinational online giant Amazon is being investigated by the Competition Commission of European Union for its tax practices in the zone. A file photo of the logo of Amazon.

The European Union’s competition authority on Tuesday opened an investigation into Amazon’s corporate income tax practices on suspicion the online retailer is benefiting from an illegal rebate to stash away most of its profits made in the 28-nation bloc.

The move is part of a wider crackdown on multinational firms’ ability to avoid taxes by shifting profits and costs between countries. Apple Inc., coffee chain Starbucks and the financial arm of carmaker Fiat are also under investigation.

In Amazon’s case, the EU is probing whether a 2003 tax agreement struck between the company and the government of Luxembourg where Amazon records most of its European profits is a way to avoid taxes and constitutes illegal state aid, distorting competition.

If the bloc’s executive Commission were to rule against Amazon in the coming months, the Seattle, Washington-based company would likely have to repay taxes for its European operations, its biggest overseas market.

Amazon registers its profits from across the EU at its unit in Luxembourg, Amazon EU Sarl. That unit’s profits are greatly reduced by making royalty payments to another Luxembourg-based Amazon entity, which is not subject to corporate taxation.

That has attracted the Commission’s attention - “As a result, most European profits of Amazon are recorded in Luxembourg but are not taxed in Luxembourg,” it said.

EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia told reporters in Brussels the EU suspects the royalty payments are not in line with fair market rules and are exaggerated so as to avoid taxation.

“National authorities must not allow selected companies to understate their taxable profits by using favorable calculation methods,” Mr. Almunia added.

The Commission provided no estimate of the amount of taxes Amazon saved through the arrangement.

Luxembourg rejected the Commission’s allegations as “unsubstantiated.” Its finance ministry said “no special tax treatment or advantage has been awarded to Amazon.”

The tiny landlocked country of some 500,000 people has over the past decades become one of the world’s wealthiest nations by attracting financial firms and large corporations by offering banking secrecy and favourable taxation.

Luxembourg long resisted the EU Commission’s demand to submit tax information on Amazon and other cases, but the government lost a court battle against Brussels and eventually head to hand over the information.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.