CCI order puts truck operators in a spot

September 04, 2014 08:41 pm | Updated 09:58 pm IST - NEW DELHI:

A compliant was filed against AIMTC talleging that it indulged in cartelisation. . File Photo : Bhagya Prakash K

A compliant was filed against AIMTC talleging that it indulged in cartelisation. . File Photo : Bhagya Prakash K

Having wrapped up the probe into allegations of cartelisation by freight operators, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) has sought their financial statements for the past three years before the final hearing on September 24. The CCI order for financial statements has not gone down well with the truckers, who are also challenging the main allegation of cartelisation. “We are a highly fragmented, unstructured industry. We are also market-driven and accordingly tariffs are decided by the play of market forces,” noted Navin Gupta whose All India Motor Transport Congress (AIMTC).

Other trucking sources said the demand for financial statements and the cartelisation charges should not be imposed on an industry that was not ‘closely knit’ and under severe strain due to ever-increasing operating costs.

The CCI has been hearing a complaint by the Indian Foundation Transport Research and Training (IFTRT) which says AIMTC indulged in cartelisation by directing its members to hike truck rentals by 15 per cent after diesel prices were increased by Rs.5 a litre in September 2012.

IFTRT’s S. P. Singh, who filed the complaint, says as per the yellow books of goods transport firms or common carriers, there are about 2.5 lakh entities that accept cargo and it is claimed that they control 85 per cent of the road cargo. “The strict enforcement of the Carriage by Road Act will remove the fly-by-night operators and lead to consolidation of the transport industry,” he stated.

The CCI had, in January last year, asked its Director-General (Investigation) to probe the complaint as “the diktat issued by an association to its members to raise the price of services by certain percentage.... and opined that there a prima facie case of anti-competitive practice exists.”

The report bolstered by a supplementary filing on July 15 this year concluded that alleged move for rental hike was a violation of the law. Subsequently, CCI issued a three-page order for final hearing of the case with suggestions or objections to the report by the CCI’s DG (Investigation) by September 17.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.