What works and what doesn’t for start ups

February 12, 2017 07:59 pm | Updated 07:59 pm IST - BENGALURU

Participating in a debate on ‘India’s Startup Story: Where Do We Go From Here?’, Mahesh Murthy, co-founder of Seedfund, said startups, which get launched when the markets are doing well, can sometimes lead to a false sense of security.

Rajiv Lochan, the MD & CEO of The Hindu Group, who moderated the discussion, set the narrative for the debate pointing out how newspaper headlines about start ups ranging from receiving mega funding to taps running dry reflected their evolution in the country.

Co-founder & chairman of Portea Medical, K. Ganesh said start ups have seen multiple cycles. “Hence, to get worried about swinging from huge euphoria to complete depression is unwarranted. There is a lot of sanity which is coming in to the sector,” he pointed out.

Anu Acharya, the CEO of Mapmygenome, said it was important to build a good business and how much impact it has created. “It takes time to build a company. For me, building a company is not to follow the money trail, but to make an impact and not worry about whether the people are listening or not, but at some point they will.”

Ananth Narayanan, the CEO of Myntra and Jabong, said a start ups like theirs have created sustainable business based on a combination of India-specific innovation and technology which has resulted in an ecosystem for entrepreneurs to take risks.

On the copy-and-paste culture

Mr. Murthy also referred to how the copy-and-paste culture has set in among the startups in India. “Take what is in the U.S. and copy and paste it here. It has worked in China and Russia because of the environment there.” However, to replicate here may not always work.

Mr. Ganesh, however, said taking good practices from the so-called copy-and-paste model and evolving one’s own unique model was one way out. For example, the cash-on-delivery model was an India-specific model which has worked very well for the Indian consumers. “There are good things to be learnt from what has worked in the US. There is nothing called copy-and-paste model. We should be slightly more generous with our startups before judging them.”

Mr. Mahesh countered it by pointing out that 15 to 20 years ago, the markets were lot more forgiving but today there are just two to three startups which dominate each sector and hence one should create a model for the market that the startups are playing in.

Agreeing with Mr. Ganesh, Myntra CEO Mr. Narayanan pointed out that the country’s fashion industry was mostly unbranded and hence their start up came up with private label initiatives which has worked for them. Earlier, there were 10-15 start ups in our space but one has seen a consolidation since then because those which survived came up with India-specific innovation, Mr. Narayanan said.

Answering a question from the audience about the reason for lack of funding for non-technology start ups, Mr. Murthy said most investments are driven by tenure and it becomes necessary to find start ups which can give returns within a span of eight to 10 years. “Therefore, most tech startups are the ones who have a better chance of giving better returns with that time span.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.