Won’t return to husband: Divya

Vanniyar girl feels isolated after reports suggested possibility of reunion

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:20 pm IST

Published - July 04, 2013 01:13 am IST - CHENNAI:



In a bid to put an end to the controversy surrounding her decision to leave her husband, Divya, the Vanniayar girl from Dharmapuri district whose marriage to a Dalit youth led to caste tensions last year, said on Wednesday that she would never return to her husband, E. Ilavarasan.

A couple of days after she said she would continue to stay with her mother until her inter-caste marriage gained family acceptance, Divya told reporters on the Madras High Court campus that she would not return to her husband again and would live with her mother.

A Bench, comprising Justices M.Jaichandren and M.M.Sundresh, is hearing on habeas corpus petition filed by her mother Thenmozhi.

Ending speculation about her future move, Ms. Divya came to the High Court and told the media on Wednesday: “Hereafter, I am not ready to lead a life with him (Elavarasan) under any circumstances. I will be with my mother and try to compensate the loss of my father in the family.” Her father had committed suicide last November.

“Initially, I loved and married (him). Later, my father died and untoward incidents occurred in the village. The hardship of the villagers and my father’s death caused me distress... Under those circumstances, I had to be there (her matrimonial home) and could not come out immediately. So, I took time to do so.”

Asked whether she was going with her mother for the moment, she said: “I thought earlier that that I need both my mother and him (Ilavarasan). But the thought of my father’s death still agonises me. I cannot live with him (her husband) hereafter.” She added that reports that suggested she might return to her husband one day had completely isolated her from society.

Earlier, Rupert J.Barnabas and K.Balu, counsel for Thenmozhi, withdrew the habeas corpus petition on the ground that her daughter had returned and hence, the matter may be closed. However, R.Sankarasubbu, counsel for Mr. Ilavarasan, vehemently opposed the closure of the matter, and wanted the court to keep the petition pending in view of its wider social ramifications.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.