Madras High Court directs Tamil Nadu government to list steps taken to prevent illegal erection of flex boards, banners

The Court recorded the submission of State Government Pleader P. Muthukumar that an affidavit would be filed by November 7; it also insisted on the strict enforcement of the T.N. Urban Local Bodies (Permission for Erection of Digital Banners and Placards) Rules

October 05, 2023 01:36 pm | Updated 02:07 pm IST - CHENNAI

Illegal flex boards, banners and cut-outs have often led to the loss of lives on public roads. Photograph used for representational purposes only

Illegal flex boards, banners and cut-outs have often led to the loss of lives on public roads. Photograph used for representational purposes only | Photo Credit: GOVARTHAN M

The Madras High Court on Thursday directed the Tamil Nadu government to file an affidavit by November 7, listing the steps it has taken so far to prevent the erection of illegal flex boards, festoons, buntings, hoardings, cut-outs and the like, which, at times, cause mishaps, leading to loss of lives on public roads.

Chief Justice S.V. Gangapurwala and Justice D. Bharatha Chakravarthy recorded the submission of State Government Pleader P. Muthukumar that such an affidavit would be filed in the court within a month. The judges said they expected similar affidavits from the local bodies concerned too.

The interim order was passed during the hearing of a batch of cases filed by activist ‘Traffic’ K.R. Ramaswamy (since deceased) alleging official inaction against illegal flexboards, and also a petition filed in 2021 regarding the electrocution of a 13-year-old boy during the erecting of DMK flagpoles in Villupuram.

The petitioner’s counsel S. Sheik Ismail claimed the minor boy had died while erecting iron flagpoles to welcome Higher Education Minister K. Ponmudy for a wedding that a DMK cadre’s family was celebrating. However, senior counsel R. Viduthulai, representing Mr. Ponmudy said the Minister did not attend the event.

On his part, advocate K. Arvind, who was earlier representing Mr. Ramaswamy, sought some time to substitute another petitioner in the place of the activist who had died in May 2021. The judges accepted his request and adjourned the hearing on the batch of cases by a month but insisted on an affidavit from the government.

The Chief Justice said, preventing illegal flex boards from being erected was more important than taking action against the violators after the reporting of mishaps. He wanted to know the modalities that had been put in place by the State as well as the local bodies to prevent such illegal installations. He also insisted on the strict enforcement of the Tamil Nadu Urban Local Bodies (Permission for Erection of Digital Banners and Placards) Rules, 2011, during the granting of permission to erect flex boards and the like in public places.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.