Dindigul 'Thalappakatti’ biriyani wins trademark row

Chennai-based ‘Thalappakattu’ dubbed imitation

Updated - April 06, 2013 11:45 am IST

Published - April 06, 2013 02:22 am IST - CHENNAI:

FOR DOWNTOWN/ ANNA NAGARFROM, T.MADHAVAN, STAFF REPORTERCHENNAI: 23/06/2009: For a tasty food: Diners at Thalappakatti Restaurant at Anna Nagar. Photo: Handout_E_Mail.{[eom]

FOR DOWNTOWN/ ANNA NAGARFROM, T.MADHAVAN, STAFF REPORTERCHENNAI: 23/06/2009: For a tasty food: Diners at Thalappakatti Restaurant at Anna Nagar. Photo: Handout_E_Mail.{[eom]

As intellectual property disputes go, this one was in real good taste. Two similar-sounding brand names competed for primacy in the biriyani market, and the older one prevailed.

Ending a long-running dispute, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board here has ruled that Dindigul-based ‘Thalappakatti’ is the genuine trademark and that Chennai-based ‘Thalappakattu’ is an imitation.

The Bench comprising its chairman Justice Prabha Sridevan and its member V.Ravi upheld the order passed by Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks in favour of Thalappakatti Naidu Ananda Vilas Biriyani Hotel, Dindigul, and dismissed the applications of Thalapakattu Biriyani and Fast Food, Chennai, for trademark registration.

The dispute arose in the early 2000s. The Deputy Registrar in 2010 allowed the application of the Dindigul restaurant for its registration ‘Thalappakatti’, but refused the claim of Chennai restaurant. The Thalappakatti Ananda Vilas Biriyani Hotel was the prior and genuine adopter and continuous user of the mark ‘Thalappakatti’. The mark ‘Thalappakattu’ is an imitation and was likely to cause confusion. Aggrieved by this, the Chennai-based restaurateur filed an appeal before the IPAB.

The proprietors of the Dindigul-based mark claimed that way back in 1957, Nagasamy Naidu started the Ananda Vilas Briyani Stall. It later became famous as Thalappakatti Biriyani Naidu Hotel since the turbaned Naidu was called ‘Thalappakatti Naidu’. After him, his son and grandson carried on the business, which expanded to Coimbatore and Tirupur, and acquired a huge reputation because of the quality of its biriyani.

However, Chennai-based restaurant ‘Thalappakattu Biriyani & Fast Food claimed that its promoters’ ancestor Sulaiman was the Chief of the Horse Regiment in the palace of Raja of Sivaganga. As he wore a turban, his family came to be known as ‘Thalappakattu Rawthers’. They started the hotel business on a small scale in 2005 and as a mark of respect to their ancestors, they adopted the word ‘Thalappakattu’. According to them, they served extremely delicious biriyani and the adoption of the name was bona fide.

Dismissing the claim with Rs.20,000 cost, the Bench concluded that in the face of the evidence adduced by the Dindigul’s Thalappakatti, the only conclusion “can be of dishonesty in adoption.” ‘Thalappakattu’ and ‘Thalappakatti’ did not even have any phonetic difference. The last syllable was not stressed.

“In fact, in speech, both will be used interchangeably. The appellant clearly intended to ride on the respondent’s reputation.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.