Supreme Court to continue virtual court system

The decision follows the “alarming growth” in coronavirus cases

Updated - June 15, 2020 02:53 am IST

Published - June 14, 2020 10:09 pm IST - NEW DELHI

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

A committee of seven Supreme Court judges, led by Justice N.V. Ramana, has decided to continue the virtual court system and not revert to the physical hearings, given the “alarming growth” in novel coronavirus cases and its fallout.

A letter from the Supreme Court Registry to the office-bearers of the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association said the “Supreme Court of India shall continue functioning through the virtual court system for the present, with further direction that the matters may be listed before hon’ble judge-in-chambers as well as before the court of the registrar, through virtual court system only, to enable wider participation of learned advocates”.

The Registry informed the lawyers that the committee would next meet on June 30 or any other suitable date to again take stock of the situation and further consider suggestions.

On June 2, the court agreed to consult and explore the feasibility of physical appearances of advocates in the court while adhering to physical distancing norms amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

The court has been hearing urgent cases through video-conference. The Benches hearing these cases sit in the courtrooms, while lawyers make their submissions , through video links from their homes or offices. The court had named this mechanism the virtual court system.

The Supreme Court Advocates-on Record Association, the Supreme Court Bar Association and the Bar Council of India have been repeatedly making representations to the court that a majority of the lawyers feel that they cannot effectively present their arguments at virtual hearings. They have been urging the court to resume physical court hearings from July.

In a circular issued in the first week of June, the court indicated it was open to physical court hearings, provided advocates and parties gave a joint consent with regard to their “willingness for physically appearing and arguing in court”.

The court had then said it would consider the possibility subject to the availability of Benches, the orders of the competent authority and physical distancing norms. However, subsequent consultations and the increase in infections, especially in the capital, have led the judges to re-think their options.

The other members of the committee are Justices Arun Mishra, RF Nariman, UU Lalit, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud, and L Nageswara Rao.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.