President rejects Tamil Nadu’s plea to release Rajiv Gandhi killing case convicts

Decision taken on the advice of Home Ministry; Ram Nath Kovind tells State that the Centre “doesn’t concur with its view”

June 15, 2018 01:21 am | Updated December 01, 2021 06:02 am IST - New Delhi

Nalini Sriharan, one of the convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assasination case. File

Nalini Sriharan, one of the convicts in the Rajiv Gandhi assasination case. File

President Ram Nath Kovind has rejected the Tamil Nadu government’s request to release the seven prisoners convicted for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi on May 21, 1991.

Mr. Kovind conveyed to the government that the “Centre doesn’t concur with its view” to release the prisoners. The President is bound by the advice of his Council of Ministers in such matters.

Humanitarian grounds

In the last four years, the State government has written twice to the Home Ministry to pardon the convicts and release them on humanitarian grounds.

V. Sriharan alias Murugan,

V. Sriharan alias Murugan,


“The President has rejected the Tamil Nadu government’s plea to free the prisoners on the advice of the Home Ministry. This has been conveyed to the State. The assassins of the former Prime Minister of India cannot walk free under any circumstances,” a top official told The Hindu .


On February 14, following the Supreme Court’s directions, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) sought details on eight grounds from the State to “facilitate further” its request to release the convicts. It asked the State to furnish details such as the “physical and mental status of the convicts,” their “economic and social background” and the previous cases registered against them. The convicts are V. Sriharan alias Murugan, A.G. Perarivalan, T. Suthendraraja alias Santhan, Jayakumar, Robert Payas, Ravichandran and Nalini.

On January 23, a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court gave three months to the Home Ministry to decide on Tamil Nadu’s proposal to remit the sentences of the life-term convicts. The Centre moved court against the State’s proposal, which dates back to February 19, 2014, where it said the State had decided to remit their sentences as they had already served more than 20 years in prison.

 A.G. Perarivalan. File

A.G. Perarivalan


Under Section 435 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the State government has to consult the Centre before releasing prisoners who were tried by the CBI or under a central legislation.

On March 2, 2016, then T.N Chief Secretary K. Gnanadesikan sent another communication to the MHA that it had received petitions from the convicts with requests to release them since they have spent more than 20 years in prison. “The Government, after taking into consideration the petitions of the seven convicts, has decided to remit the sentences of life imprisonment as they have already served imprisonment for 24 years,” Mr. Gnanadesikan's letter said.

In December 2015, the Supreme Court said the State government had no power to release the convicts without the Centre’s concurrence.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.