Supreme Court wrong in revealing sensitive reports: Kiren Rijiju

Collegium putting IB, RAW reports in public domain a matter of grave concern, says Law Minister, adding that government commenting on issues such as NJAC does not lower dignity of judiciary

January 24, 2023 02:37 pm | Updated 11:58 pm IST - New Delhi

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju addresses a press conference in New Delhi on January 24, 2023.

Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju addresses a press conference in New Delhi on January 24, 2023. | Photo Credit: PTI

Amid the running battle between the Executive and the Judiciary over judicial appointments, Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Tuesday said it was a matter of “grave concern” that the Supreme Court Collegium put certain portions of sensitive reports of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) in public domain.

Intelligence agency officials, who work in a secret manner, will “think twice” in future if their reports are made public, Mr. Rijiju told presspersons on the sidelines of a Law Ministry event.

He was responding to questions on the Collegium resolutions that contained portions of the IB and RAW reports regarding some advocates who were recommended for appointment as High Court judges. “Putting the sensitive or secret reports of RAW and IB in public domain is a matter of grave concern on which I will react at an appropriate time,” he said.

On being asked if he would “sensitise” Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud to it, he said, “The honourable Chief Justice and I meet so often. We are always in touch. He is the head of the Judiciary and I am the bridge between the government and the Judiciary so we have to work together. You cannot work in isolation.”

He, however, stressed that matters of appointments were an administrative matter, and government functionaries commenting on issues such as the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) did not amount to lowering the dignity of the Judiciary.

Also Read | Judges don’t face public scrutiny, don’t stand for elections: Kiren Rijiju

In an unprecedented move on January 20, the collegium made public the Centre’s objection to appointment of advocates Saurabh Kirpal, Somasekhar Sundaresan and John Sathyan as judges of the High Courts of Delhi, Bombay and Madras, respectively. While reiterating their names, it rejected the objection to Mr. Kirpal’s openly gay status, and concerns about critical social media posts against the Modi government by the other two advocates.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.