LS members lambast Montek, seek disbandment of panel

Updated - November 16, 2021 11:25 pm IST

Published - March 21, 2012 12:21 pm IST - New Delhi

The Planning Commission's method to fix the national poverty line of Rs. 22.40 per day for an adult in rural areas and Rs. 28.65 per day for an adult in urban areas in 2009-10 has been criticised by many parties.

The Planning Commission's method to fix the national poverty line of Rs. 22.40 per day for an adult in rural areas and Rs. 28.65 per day for an adult in urban areas in 2009-10 has been criticised by many parties.

Lok Sabha members, cutting across party lines, on Wednesday lambasted Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia for the “cut-off poverty line” estimate released by the Commission and sought his removal as well as its disbandment “for deceiving the country and cheating people”.

“This is a cruel joke on the poor,” the members asserted and demanded a statement from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

Speaker Meira Kumar too expressed her concern on the plight of poor in the country. “We have to be with them,” she said.

Soon after the House assembled for the day, the members disrupted the proceedings by raising the subject, forcing an adjournment till noon.

They took strong objection to the Commission's figures, released on Tuesday, based on the latest National Sample Survey (2009-10) that claimed the number of poor had come down to 29.8 per cent in 2009-10 from 37.2 per cent in 2004-05. “These calculations are based on the daily per capita consumption of Rs. 28 in urban areas and Rs. 22 in rural areas,” the Commission said.

It also claimed there was a decline in the incidence of poverty by 7.3 per cent over the past five years and added that as per the new poverty estimate, anyone with a daily consumption expenditure of Rs. 28.35 and Rs. 22.42 in urban and rural areas respectively was above the poverty line.

In September last, the Commission filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court in which the below poverty line (BPL) cap was pegged at a daily expenditure of Rs. 32 and Rs. 26 by an individual in urban and rural areas respectively at the going rate of inflation in 2010-11.

Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj took objection to the absence of Dr. Singh, who also happens to be the Chairman of the Commission, in the House when the subject was being discussed. There were efforts to wipe out the poor and not poverty, she charged.

Ms. Swaraj said the government, by accepting the report, was the real guilty. She sought its outright rejection and a fresh look at the poverty situation. She also sought the intervention of UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, who was present in the House, for rejection of the report and formulation of a new one that reflected the true picture of the poor.

“Exploiting the poor”

Sharad Yadav (JD-U) charged Mr. Ahluwalia with “exploiting the poor” and sought his removal. “I don't know from where the Planning Commission got such statistics and it is time the Commission is reformed as the present set-up is not in favour of the poor.”

Mulayam Singh (SP) said when 65 per cent of the country's people were living below the poverty line, it was not possible to accept the Commission's findings, prepared by people sitting in air-conditioned rooms who tried to give a rosy picture on the country's living standard to the international agencies.

It should be remembered that there were still so many people sleeping on footpaths without proper shelter.

Basudeb Acharia (CPI-M) condemned the Commission's efforts to use “fraudulent methods to underestimate poverty” and claimed that there was a national outrage on the latest statistics.

Kalyan Banerjee (Trinamool Congress) wanted the government to reconsider the whole issue with relevant facts and not on imaginary data. He even suggested convening a Chief Ministers' conference to discuss the issue.

T.R. Baalu (DMK) sought a special briefing session by the Planning Commission to MPs on the issue as the latter know better about the ground realities.

V. Arun Kumar (Congress) alleged that Opposition members were trying to mislead Parliament as the Commission had told the Supreme Court that the figures were per capita and not for the whole family. The family-wise figures were Rs. 4,824 for urban areas and Rs. 3,905 for rural areas a month.

Anant Geete (Shiv Sena) wanted the Lok Sabha to pass a resolution expressing disagreement over the Commission's data.

Prabodh Panda (CPI) hit out at Mr. Ahluwalia saying the latter thought he was above Parliament and it was deplorable that the country was being ruled by the Commission.

B. Mahtab (BJD) alleged that the Commission was confusing the whole country as a good lawyer who confused the court when his case was weak.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.