Lavalin case hearing posted for January

Petition challenging order discharging Pinarayi

November 29, 2013 05:10 am | Updated November 28, 2021 09:33 pm IST - KOCHI:

The Kerala High Court on Thursday ordered posting in January next for hearing a petition challenging a CBI Special Court order discharging CPI(M) State secretary Pinarayi Vijayan and other accused from the SNC-Lavalin case. When the petition was taken up, Justice Thomas P. Joseph said he was yet to go through the docket. Counsel for the CBI submitted that the agency would be filing a petition against the special court order soon. The court then observed that a petition filed by T.P. Nandakumar, editor, ‘Crime’, could be taken up along with the petition to be filed by the CBI after the Christmas vacation.

The petition came up before the new Judge after Justice K. Harilal recused himself from hearing the petition last time.

The case

The CBI case was that Mr. Vijayan, while serving as Electricity Minister from May 1996 to October 1998, along with the other accused, had hatched a criminal conspiracy to award the contract for the renovation and modernisation of the Pallivasal, Sengulam and Panniar hydroelectric projects to the Canadian company, SNC-Lavalin, at an exorbitant cost. The CBI further alleged that the KSEB had entered into the MoU without inviting tenders, violating all rules and regulations.

The special court while discharging Mr. Vijayan and other accused had held that the CBI was not able to prove that any of the accused gained pecuniary advantage while awarding the contract to the SNC-Lavalin. The charges levelled against the accused were groundless and all the accused were entitled to get a discharge, the court said.

Petitioner’s argument

In his petition, Mr. Nandakuamar contended that the special court had overemphasised the non-execution of an agreement in relation to the grant of money to the Malabar Cancer Centre to find reasons for discharging the accused. He said the special court was not expected to examine whether there was sufficient ground for conviction of the accused or whether the trial was sure to end in his conviction.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.