High Court allows AI's plea

It upheld a Single Bench order deeming the Indian Pilots' Guild members' strike illegal

May 17, 2012 06:53 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:11 pm IST - Mumbai

Indian Pilots Guild leader Tauseef Muqaddam has said that the Air India pilots’s body will take opinion of legal experts in the wake of the Delhi High Court decision to reject their plea. File photo

Indian Pilots Guild leader Tauseef Muqaddam has said that the Air India pilots’s body will take opinion of legal experts in the wake of the Delhi High Court decision to reject their plea. File photo

Upholding a Single Bench order allowing a plea by the Air India management that the strike by the pilots belonging to the Indian Pilots' Guild (IPG) was illegal, the Delhi High Court on Thursday dismissed an appeal by the IPG against the order.

The Court had allowed AI's plea in respect to its argument that the pilots had gone on strike without serving a prior notice to the management as per the Industrial Disputes Act.

Dismissing the appeal, the Division Bench said: “In this case, we have no doubt that the members of the appellant are and continue to be in violation of the order of the learned Single Judge.

“Since we are not entertaining the appeal and the order of the learned Single Judge stands, the members of the appellant would be well advised to comply with the orders… failing which it would be open to the Judge pending decision on the interlocutory application to proceed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the provisions of Order 39 rule 2A of the Code and the attendant powers which the court has under the Constitution of India, as a court of record, against the members of the appellant.

“The appellant, however, is at liberty to approach the learned Single Judge to vacate, modify or vary the impugned order,” the Bench said.

A labour dispute: pilots

The IPG had challenged the Single Bench order, arguing that the disputes between the management and the pilots were a labour dispute and that therefore, only a labour court could hear it.

The guild had also challenged the territorial jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court, submitting that the guild's address given in AI's suit was of Mumbai.

But the Bench dismissed both arguments.

The Single Bench had restrained the pilots from continuing with the “illegal strike and/or reporting sick and/or staging demonstrations, dharnas, gheraos etc. inside and outside the premises of the plaintiff-company located at the airports, terminals, head offices and all other offices of the plaintiff-company, including the residence of the officers of the plaintiff-company.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.