Locals bat for Tirupati as capital

Sivaramakrishnan panel visits city; YSRC terms it an ‘eyewash’. They vouched for the overall development of the State, laying stress on decentralisation across the various districts.

July 09, 2014 11:41 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 12:15 pm IST - TIRUPATI:

Members of the Sivaramakrishnan Committee coming out of Sri Venkateswara University's senate hall after receiving representations in Tirupati on Wednesday. – PHOTO: K.V. Poornachandra Kumar

Members of the Sivaramakrishnan Committee coming out of Sri Venkateswara University's senate hall after receiving representations in Tirupati on Wednesday. – PHOTO: K.V. Poornachandra Kumar

The visit of the Capital Citation Committee (K. Sivaramakrishnan Committee) to the temple city on Wednesday, seeking representations for the potential location of capital zones, passed off smoothly with fervent appeals from participants for making Tirupati the capital and decentralised development across the State.

Members of political parties, non-governmental organisations and individuals highlighted the importance of Tirupati and the region’s strengths.

They vouched for the overall development of the State, laying stress on decentralisation across the various districts.

While Congress representatives cited the proximity of the temple city to metropolitan cities like Bangalore and Chennai, members of the BJP urged the committee members to set up a capital without causing inconvenience to people, especially those of Rayalaseema, who had been subjected to gross injustice in the past.

Centre for Rayalaseema Studies (CRS) president Bhuman advised policy makers not to cite non-availability of water resources and government lands as a reason for not setting up the capital. Reiterating Mr. Bhuman’s view, Prof. Krishna Mohan Reddy of Sri Venkateswara University (SVU) maintained that developing a capital on the lines of Hyderabad would cause another movement for a separate State.  

Members of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) and the YSRC termed the exercise of the committee an “eyewash”.

They alleged that the State government had already finalised the region, and that it was evident from halting land registration at some places. Some questioned as to why the committee was not established before bifurcation, as Andhra Pradesh was the first State to be divided without a capital city.

Andhra Pradesh Abhivruddhi Porata Samithi (AAPS) president N. Raja Reddy and secretary T. Venkateswarlu demanded that Tirupati be made the capital or at least the second capital.

Connectivity

Meanwhile, panel member Aromar Revi maintained that providing connectivity between regional hubs like Tirupati and Vijayawada would usher in development. “Many areas are reeling under drought-like condition, while water supply is important in development,” he said. The panel felt that the feeling of being historically neglected was palpable among the people of Rayalaseema.

Earlier, district officials apprised the committee of existing infrastructure facilities through topographic and satellite images. Besides seeking representations for the capital, the committee also kept track of the special development challenges of the regions.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.