SC reserves verdict on guidelines for encounter deaths probe

It took on record responses of the Centre, State Governments, Union Territories and National Human Rights Commission for framing the guidelines.

September 03, 2014 08:56 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 06:53 am IST - New Delhi

The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its verdict on the issue of laying down guidelines for probing cases of encounter deaths and extra—judicial killings.

A bench, headed by Chief Justice R M Lodha, has taken on record responses of the Centre, State Governments, Union Territories and National Human Rights Commission for framing the guidelines to deal with the issues of encounter killings.

The petition was filed by NGO, People’s Union for Civil Liberties’ (PUCL) which, along with NHRC, had also suggested the setting up a separate and independent probe agency under NHRC or the state human rights commission to probe every encounter killings.

The plea has sought that unless proved beyond doubt that an encounter was genuine, no officer should be promoted or rewarded and compensation money for dependents of every fake encounter killing should be equivalent to the reward money given to the police in such operations.

During the hearing, the court was told that some states like Tripura, Mizoram, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Arunanchal Pradesh and Telangana have not set up state human rights commission.

The bench, also comprising Justice R F Nariman, heard submissions relating to the proposal for streamlining the process of media briefings by police.

The bench posted the hearing on the issue after six weeks asking advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, who is assisting as amicus curiae (friend of the court), to frame a detailed questionnaire to be circulated to the Centre and state governments in two weeks.

The bench is examining the propriety of police officers briefing the media on the progress of an investigation of a particular case.

It asked Sankaranarayanan to prepare a comprehensive note and charts about various guidelines suggested by various parties in the matter.

The bench also told Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar that the Centre should not be on the backfoot merely because law and order is a state subject and issue directions to State governments.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.