Supreme Court refuses to review 2014 ban on jallikattu

Updated - November 17, 2021 03:16 am IST

Published - January 21, 2016 08:21 pm IST - NEW DELHI

DELHI, 23/11/2013: FILE photo: Supreme Court of India. New Delhi on Saturday. Photo: Monica Tiwari

DELHI, 23/11/2013: FILE photo: Supreme Court of India. New Delhi on Saturday. Photo: Monica Tiwari

The Supreme Court on Thursday declined three petitions filed by private individuals to review its May 7, 2014 judgment banning jallikattu (bull-taming sport) as an inherently cruel act.

In a decision taken in their chambers, a Bench of Justices V. Gopala Gowda and P.C. Ghose refused to entertain the petitions in line with the court’s recent order to stay a January 7, 2016 government notification allowing the sport. The petitioners were Arulmigu Muppillisamy Temple, Tamil Nadu Parampariya Veera Vilayattu Mattu Vandi Kaalaigal State Welfare Association and J.K. Ritheesh from Tamil Nadu. However, Tamil Nadu’s review petition, filed on May 19, 2014, is still pending.

On January 12, a Bench of Justices Dipak Misra and N.V. Ramana refused to budge despite impassioned arguments from the Centre and Tamil Nadu that a festival intrinsic to the culture and tradition of a State could not be prohibited, especially when the 2016 notification put in place safeguards to prevent the cruel treatment of animals.

“What is the necessity of such a festival [jallikattu]... there was no festival for four years,” Justice Misra had shot back before staying the government notification.

Ordering interim stay, the Bench had also issued notice to the Centre and Tamil Nadu government to respond to a batch of petitions led by Animal Welfare Board of India (AWBI) against the 2016 notification. Some of them have even sought contempt of court action against the Centre.

The 2014 ban issued by a Bench led by Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan had held that jallikattu, bullock cart race and other such events “per se violate the Prevention of Cruelty of Animal (PCA) Act”.

Consequently, bulls were banned from being used as “performing animals” either for jallikattu events or bullock-cart races in the States of Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra or elsewhere in country.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.