19 Afghan soldiers killed in Taliban attack

February 23, 2014 03:54 pm | Updated May 18, 2016 10:27 am IST - KABUL

The Taliban have attacked an army checkpoint in eastern Afghanistan, leaving 19 soldiers dead and seven missing, officials said.

Gen. Mohammad Zahir Azimi, who is spokesman for the Defence Ministry, said the attack happened in the Ghazi Abad district of Kunar Province early Sunday morning. He confirmed that 19 soldiers were dead and two injured.

Abdul Ghani Musamem, spokesman for the governor of Kunar Province, said seven soldiers were missing following the attack. It was not immediately clear if the soldiers had been kidnapped or had fled during the assault.

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack in an emailed statement, saying that one of their insurgents was killed and two were wounded.

Karzai puts off Sri Lanka visit

Afghan President Hamid Karzai delayed Sunday his official visit to Sri Lanka as Taliban militants launched a deadly assault on an army outpost, killing 20 soldiers.

Scores of militants, including foreign nationals, attacked a military corps outpost in Ghaziabad district early Sunday morning, security officials said.

Ghaziabad is in the eastern province of Kunar, bordering with Pakistani tribal areas.

“Hundreds of enemy attacked the outpost from four directions. The soldiers stationed there bravely resisted for one and an half hours,” said Noman Atefi, an army spokesman in the eastern region.

“Unfortunately, 20 soldiers were killed and two wounded in the attack,” Atefi told dpa, adding that seven soldiers went missing.

Earlier, a police official had said that seven soldiers were captured by the Taliban fighters, of which four managed to escape.

“Nobody has been taken by the insurgents,” Atefi said. They had probably retreated to save their lives and guns, he added.

This was the largest attack on Afghan security forces in five months after the militants killed 18 troops in an ambush in September in the north-eastern province of Badakhshan.

He said the attack was “organised by foreign intelligence agencies,” and added that tens attackers were also killed.

Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack.

“The mujahideen (freedom fighters) occupied an important army base and killed scores of soldiers,” spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said in a statement.

He said they left the post after destroying it.

The army spokesman denied Taliban’s allegation, saying 14 soldiers who were unhurt, resisted and held the outpost.

“The enemies escaped the area, leaving the bodies of their colleagues behind.” Afghan Defence Ministry Spokesman Zahir Azimi said that reinforcements were sent to the area, but came under fire en route.

“A militant who was likely waiting for the additional troops blew himself up near them,” Azimi said in a statement, adding that no troops were hurt.

President Karzai postponed his visit to Sri Lanka after the news of the killing of soldiers broke.

“The Afghan president is saddened by the tragic incident, and postponed his official trip to Sri Lanka,” his office said in a statement.

Taliban suspends talks on US soldier

In an another development, Afghanistan’s Taliban says it has suspended “mediation” with the United States to exchange captive U.S. soldier Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five senior Taliban prisoners held in U.S. custody in Guantanamo Bay, halting at least temporarily what was considered the best chance yet of securing the 27-year-old’s freedom since his capture in 2009.

In a terse Pashto language statement emailed to the Associated Press on Sunday, Zabihullah Mujahed blamed the “current complex political situation in the country” for the suspension.

Bergdahl, of Hailey, Idaho, was last seen in a video released in December, footage seen as “proof of life” demanded by the United States. Bergdahl is believed to be held in the border regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Mujahed said the indirect talks with the United States had been mediated by the Middle Eastern state of Qatar, where the Taliban established a political office last June. The video of Bergdahl was part of the negotiations which were to lead to the eventual transfer of five senior Taliban leaders held since 2002 in Guantanamo Bay.

“The leadership of the Islamic Emirate has decided to suspend the process for some time due to the current complex political situation in the country,” according to the statement. “The process will remain suspended without the exchange of the prisoners until our decision to resume.”

The Taliban spokesman did not elaborate on what “political situation” in Afghanistan led to the suspension of talks or say when they might resume. Afghanistan is in the middle of a presidential election campaign. President Hamid Karzai cannot seek another term in office under the Afghan constitution which allows only two terms as president. The election is scheduled for April 5.

The U.S. State Department has refused to acknowledge the negotiations, but a U.S. official familiar with the negotiations confirmed to The Associated Press that indirect talks were underway. He requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

In response to the Taliban statement, U.S. Embassy Spokesman in Kabul Robert Hilton said- “Sgt. Bergdahl has been gone far too long, however we can’t discuss the efforts we’re taking to obtain his return.”

Efforts at a swap are also seen as a concession to Karzai. Washington would like to see him back away from his refusal to sign a security pact that is necessary for the United States to leave a residual force behind in Afghanistan

Karzai he wants Washington to push reconciliation between the warring factions forward, without offering specifics.

The five Taliban detainees at the heart of the proposal are the most senior Afghans still held at the prison at the U.S. base in Cuba. Each has been held since 2002.

They include:

Mohammad Fazl, whom Human Rights Watch says could be prosecuted for war crimes for presiding over the mass killing of Shiite Muslims in Afghanistan in 2000 and 2001 as the Taliban sought to consolidate its control over the country.

Abdul Haq Wasiq, who served as the Taliban deputy minister of intelligence and was in direct contact with supreme leader Mullah Omar as well as other senior Taliban figures, according to military documents. Under Wasiq, there were widespread accounts of killings, torture and mistreatment.

Mullah Norullah Nori, who was a senior Taliban commander in the northern city of Mazar—e—Sharif when the Taliban fought U.S. forces in late 2001. He previously served as a Taliban governor in two northern provinces, where he has been accused of ordering the massacre of thousands of Shiites.

Khairullah Khairkhwa, who served in various Taliban positions including interior minister and a military commander and had direct ties to Mullah Omar and Osama bin Laden, according to U.S. military documents. His U.S. lawyers have argued in court papers that his affiliation with the Taliban was a matter of circumstance, rather than ideology, and that he had backed away from them by the time of his capture. His lawyers also have argued that he was merely a civil servant and had no military role, though a judge found otherwise and said there was enough evidence to justify holding him at Guantanamo. His lawyers have appealed.

Mohammed Nabi, who served as chief of security for the Taliban in Qalat, Afghanistan and later worked as a radio operator for the Taliban’s communications office in Kabul and as an office manager in the border department, according to U.S. military documents. In the spring of 2002, he told interrogators that he received about $500 from a CIA operative as part of the unsuccessful effort to track down Mullah Omar. When that didn’t pan out, he says he ended up helping the agency locate al-Qaida members.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.