China refused to give raw data on early COVID-19 cases to a World Health Organization-led teamp robing the origins of the pandemic, one of the team's investigators said, potentially complicating efforts tounderstand how the outbreak began.
The team had requested raw patient data on the 174 cases of COVID-19 that China had identified from the early phase of theoutbreak in the Chinese city of Wuhan in December 2019, as well as other cases, but were only provided with a summary, said Dominic Dwyer, an Australian infectious diseases expert who is amember of the team.
Such raw data is known as "line listings", he said, and would typically be anonymised but contain details such as what questions were asked of individual patients, their responses and how their responses were analysed.
"That's standard practice for an outbreak investigation," he told Reuters on Saturday via video call from Sydney, where he is currently undergoing quarantine.
He said that gaining access to the raw data was especiallyimportant since only half of the 174 cases had exposure to the Huanan market, the now-shuttered wholesale seafood centre inWuhan where the virus was initially detected.
"That's why we've persisted to ask for that," he said. "Why that doesn't happen, I couldn't comment. Whether it's politicalor time or it's difficult ... But whether there are any other reasons why the data isn't available, I don't know. One would only speculate."
While the Chinese authorities provided a lot of material, hesaid the issue of access to the raw patient data would bementioned in the team's final report. "The WHO people certainly felt that they had received much much more data than they had ever received in the previous year. So that in itself is an advance."
A summary of the team's findings could be released as earlyas next week, the WHO said on Friday.
The WHO-led probe had been plagued by delay, concern overaccess and bickering between Beijing and Washington, which accused China of hiding the extent of the initial outbreak and criticised the terms of the visit, under which Chinese experts conducted the first phase of research.
The team, which arrived in China in January and spent four weeks looking into the origins of the COVID-19 outbreak, was limited to visits organised by their Chinese hosts and prevented from contact with community members, due to health restrictions.The first two weeks were spent in hotel quarantine.
China's refusal to hand over raw data on the early COVID-19 cases was reported earlier by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.
The WHO did not reply to a request from Reuters for comment.The Chinese foreign ministry did not immediately reply to arequest for comment but Beijing has previously defended its transparency in handling the outbreak and its cooperation withthe WHO mission.
Harmonious, with arguments
Dr. Dwyer said the work within the WHO team was harmonious butthat there were "arguments" at times with their Chinese counterparts over the interpretation and significance of the data, which he described as "natural" in such probes.
"We might be having a talk about cold chain and they mightbe more firm about what the data shows than what we might havebeen, but that's natural. Whether there's political pressure to have different opinions, I don't know. There may well be, but it's hard to know."
Cold chain refers to the transport and trade of frozen food.
Beijing has sought to cast doubt on the notion that thecoronavirus originated in China, pointing to imported frozen food as a conduit.
On Tuesday, Peter Ben Embarek, who led the WHO delegation, told a news conference that transmission of the virus via frozenfood is a possibility, but pointed to market vendors selling frozen animal products including farmed wild animals as apotential pathway that warrants further study.
Dr. Embarek also said that the team was not looking further intothe theory that the virus escaped from a lab, which itconsidered highly unlikely. The previous U.S. administration of President Donald Trump had said it suspected the virus may haveescaped from a Wuhan lab, which Beijing strongly denies.
"It was an unanimous feeling," Dr. Dwyer said. "It wasn't apolitical sop whatsoever."