BP retracts offshore drilling remark

August 07, 2010 09:48 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:52 pm IST - Washington

FILE - In this June 6, 2010 file photo, Plaquemines Parish coastal zone director P.J. Hahn holds up a small oiled fish at Bay Long off the coast of Louisiana. Even the people who make their living off the seafood-rich waters of Louisiana's St. Bernard Parish have a hard time swallowing the government's assurances that fish harvested in the shallow, muddy waters just offshore must be safe to eat because they don't smell too bad. Fresh splotches of chocolate-colored crude, probably globules broken apart by toxic chemical dispersants sprayed by BP with government approval, still wash up almost daily on protective boom and in marshes in reopened fishing grounds east of the Mississippi River. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)

FILE - In this June 6, 2010 file photo, Plaquemines Parish coastal zone director P.J. Hahn holds up a small oiled fish at Bay Long off the coast of Louisiana. Even the people who make their living off the seafood-rich waters of Louisiana's St. Bernard Parish have a hard time swallowing the government's assurances that fish harvested in the shallow, muddy waters just offshore must be safe to eat because they don't smell too bad. Fresh splotches of chocolate-colored crude, probably globules broken apart by toxic chemical dispersants sprayed by BP with government approval, still wash up almost daily on protective boom and in marshes in reopened fishing grounds east of the Mississippi River. (AP Photo/Charlie Riedel, File)

Oil major BP found itself furiously back-pedalling over yet another public-relations blunder when one of its officials said that the company was again considering drilling for offshore oil near the very site of the Deepwater Horizon rig from which vast amounts of oil spewed into the Gulf of Mexico for over three months.

The Associated Press quoted BP Chief Operating Officer Doug Suttles as saying that BP might drill again someday into the same undersea reservoir of oil, which is still believed to hold nearly $4 billion worth of crude. “There's lots of oil and gas here... We are going to have to think about what to do with that at some point,” Mr. Suttles reportedly said.

However late on Friday evening, BP issued another statement, emphasising that it would, at this time, focus on killing the well and on the recovery of the Gulf coastline, not on future drilling in the offshore reservoir.

The company said in a statement that its "present focus is entirely on the response effort in the Gulf of Mexico and the future use of the reservoir is not currently under consideration".

The controversy follows a string of gaffes that caused public anger, particularly comments by former BP CEO Tony Hayward, which underplayed the significance of the oil spill and the environmental damage it has caused.

The latest episode occurred even as BP finally succeeded in completing cementing operations at the ruptured wellhead, as part of the "static kill" procedure. The company said it was also continuing with relief well operations, and "depending upon weather conditions, mid-August is the current estimate of the most likely date by which the first relief well will intercept the Macondo well annulus".

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.