HC rejects farmers’ plea against DDA on Yamuna land

‘Petition is an abuse of the law process’

February 07, 2022 01:22 am | Updated 01:22 am IST - New Delhi

The High Court has rejected a plea by a farmers’ society seeking to restrain the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) from taking over a large tract of land on the Yamuna riverbank.

The court said the society has not been “able to establish any semblance of right on the property”.

Justice Subramonium Prasad called the plea filed by Yamuna Bank Kishan Bachao Morcha a “mischievous petition”, noting that “other than making a bald assertion that they are in possession of the area for the last 100 years, there is no document on record to establish the possession”.

100 years claim

The petitioner society said its members are farmers who are living on the banks of the Yamuna for over the last 100 years and cultivating about 15,000 bighas of land. It said the members have proof of ‘lagaan (tax)’ being paid by their forefathers from 1932 to 2012. The farmers grow radish, brinjal, potato, onion, and other vegetables on the land and pay money to the Delhi Peasants Co-Operative Multipurpose Society Limited.

The petitioner stated that on November 08, 2020, DDA officials gathered at their land on the riverbanks for evicting them. The officials went with excavators and were accompanied by a police team and two battalions of CRPF and BSF.

The High Court, however, rejected the plea saying that the society has “cleverly not mentioned the place where they are carrying out their activities”. The court also pointed out that the National Green Tribunal had on September 11, 2019 directed that a bio-diversity park be built in the area in order to cleanse the Yamuna.

The DDA said that it has been entrusted with an affirmative duty to protect the river Yamuna, its morphology and its flood plains and keep the Yamuna floodplains encroachment free, so it undertakes regular demolition and removal.

No specific information

Advocate Prabhsahay Kaur, standing counsel for the DDA, said the entire floodplains of Yamuna is about 52 to 56 km, covering an area of 1,267 hectares but the society has not given any specific area.

She added that the society’s petition was an abuse of the process of law as its members had given an undertaking to the Supreme Court that they will vacate the land.

Taking note of the submission, Justice Prasad said, “since the records show that the members of the petitioner/society are in unlawful occupation, the relief for compensation on the ground of DDA damaging the crop is not maintainable”.

“This writ petition is nothing but an abuse of the process of law and another attempt by the members of the petitioner society to cling on to the land while they have already been held to be unauthorised occupants and encroachers,” he added while dismissing the plea.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.