CWC sees shortcomings in Mekedatu report

Asks Karnataka govt. to amend pre-feasibility document

October 26, 2017 01:02 am | Updated 01:02 am IST - Chennai

Mandya Karnataka 18_August_2017 : Mekedatu along Cauvery river near Kanakapura of Ramanagaram district

Mandya Karnataka 18_August_2017 : Mekedatu along Cauvery river near Kanakapura of Ramanagaram district

The Central Water Commission (CWC) has sent back a pre-feasibility report on the Mekedatu balancing reservoir-cum-drinking water project to the Karnataka government.

This was conveyed by Manoj Kumar Sharvar, Under Secretary at the Union Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, in a letter of October 5 to K.S. Radhakrishnan, advocate and spokesperson of the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam.

The pre-feasibility report was returned with “specific comments/shortcomings for compliance and resubmission to the CWC,” the letter said. To be implemented on the Cauvery river, the balancing reservoir project has evoked a strong opposition from Tamil Nadu, which contended that the project, if carried out, would endanger its interests. The State has also approached the Supreme Court on this issue. The Union Ministry’s response follows Mr. Radhakrishnan’s letter in July to Cabinet Secretary, raising a host of issues on the Cauvery dispute which included reported reservoir projects of the Karnataka government on the river.

The Ministry also clarified that the CWC, the body to carry out techno-economic apprisal of medium and major irrigation and multi-purpose projects on inter-state rivers, had not received any other proposal from Karnataka.

In a reply sent to the DMK spokesperson under the RTI Act, the National Water Development Agency said it had decided not to take up a detailed project report on the proposed link of Pamba-Achankovil-Vaipaar rivers, a long-standing demand of the Tamil Nadu government. The reason cited by the NWDA, an organisation coming under the control of the Union Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, was the opposition of the Kerala government.

The Central agency stated that a feasibility report on the proposed link was completed and submitted to the States concerned — Kerala and Tamil Nadu. But, the Kerala government did not agree for the project, citing that “the Pamba and Achankovil rivers do not have surplus water for diversion.” This was why “no further study was taken up,” the Agency said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.