Citizen planners: a public brainstorming session

A Swiss city reimagines public space, and experiments with direct democracy in the process

March 16, 2019 04:05 pm | Updated 04:05 pm IST

The citizenry gathers, and knowledge and ideas bubble forth

The citizenry gathers, and knowledge and ideas bubble forth

Switzerland didn’t invent democracy, but provided it a very special context to flourish. Nassim Taleb praises the Swiss system as the most “antifragile” possible. While something that is robust can resist shocks and live on, and fragility makes systems vulnerable to breakdown, an antifragile system gets stronger by absorbing shocks! It can deal with what comes at it in a way that reinforces it.

One of the sources of this antifragility, according to Taleb, is the scale of Switzerland’s political institutions. He describes the country as not even a city-state, but a “municipal-state”. It has the ability to devolve power to local levels, letting tiny territories rule themselves independently while integrating them in a larger confederation, which represents all parts, rather than ruling them.

One of the earliest forms of democracy in Switzerland is known as the Landsgemeinde, where men of a town would go to the central square to debate and vote on issues of common concern. Thus, public space has for the longest time had a political function. It is where people gather and unite, and where a shared sense of purpose and identity is produced.

Refuge of chaos

Last weekend, the city of Lausanne — the fourth largest in the country — resurrected this tradition in a completely new form in order to decide what to do with its largest public squares, Riponne and Tunnel.

Suffering from a bad image due to years of neglect, the area is grey and noisy, crowded with cars, and surrounded by towering buildings occupied by state institutions. It is also known as a gathering space for homeless people and drug addicts. It has many bars and small ethnic shops. Some see it as the last remaining space of chaos and freedom in a heavily regulated environment.

Yet, rather than drafting a master plan for the area from above, the municipal authorities decided to invite the public to a massive three-day brainstorming session.

What’s more, they simultaneously organised an open air exhibition showing how the area had been shaped by 200 years of bad planning. The exhibition fundamentally questions the ability of politicians and planners to deliver good quality urbanism.

Participatory planning is a new form of direct democracy that is rapidly taking roots in many cities around the world. In some Swiss towns it has recently become a legal requirement for all urban plans. The participatory approach acknowledges that voting is a limited mode of expression that can’t capture user expertise and creativity.

What emerged was an effervescence of knowledge and ideas that bubbled from each corner of the perimeter where the event was held.

From a local pop-up radio station, to a daily soup cooking pot which heated up a small bubble room for locals to sit in a circle and chat; from a series of walkthroughs with a local historian, to an art installation that connected the two main squares at the heart of the project by paradoxically playing with an optical illusionary blocked pathway; from contributing to discovering the genius loci of the place (its essential spirit) through an audio archive, to the possibilities of a local circular economy in the neighbourhood.

The material produced now needs to be processed into a brief for the attention of architects and urban designers from all over the world who will be invited to participate in a design competition, to be judged by experts as well as the public.

Regardless of the specific design that emerges from the process, what’s clear is that the public is willing and able to engage with the space and the activities that animate it.

The next move towards direct democracy may well be to produce forms of local governance based not on a principle of representation, but on the principle of collective initiative. More than any grand plan, this is perhaps what these two squares need the most — a more fundamental form of public appropriation.

The writers are co-founders of, an urban network in Mumbai, Goa and beyond.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.