‘Don’t compare air pollution to smoking’

Experts warn against trivialising issue

Updated - November 10, 2018 04:44 pm IST

Published - November 09, 2018 10:12 pm IST - Mumbai

Smoke billows from the Bhalswa landfill in New Delhi on October 28, 2018.

Smoke billows from the Bhalswa landfill in New Delhi on October 28, 2018.

Anti-tobacco activists have expressed concern that comparing the ill-effects of air pollution to that of smoking will result in trivialising the catastrophic effects of smoking.

They say that such comparisons also promote the theory that it is all right to smoke as the air that we breathe is equally harmful.

“It is absurd to compare the health consequences of air pollution with that of smoking. Needless to say, both are equally important public health issues and the comparisons are being made to probably simplify it for lay people,” said anti-tobacco activist and cancer surgeon Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi.

“Such comparisons are based on a formula proposed by a Berkeley Earth study that draws an equivalence between the hazards of air pollution and smoking. In the words of one of the co-author of the study ‘when you bring scientific terms to something so well known as a cigarette number, it helps to raise awareness and bring discussion. It hits people in the way they can understand.’ However, the author’s metaphor is being misinterpreted and it is belittling something as serious as tobacco control,” said Dr. Chaturvedi.

“The common ingredients of air pollution are mainly carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen oxide, volatile organic compounds and suspended particulate matter. Cigarette smoke, in addition to all the above, is made of nearly 7,000 toxic chemicals and at least 69 of them are highly carcinogenic,” he said, adding that the dose or concentration of the suspended particulate matter in the air per day and per lifetime is nearly 200 times lesser than that from cigarettes.

Echoing Dr. Chaturvedi’s argument, Dr. P.C. Gupta, head of the Healis Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, said: “Air pollution is of two types — outdoor and indoor. When a smoker is present in the room, the indoor pollution levels are much higher than outdoor pollution at times. A smoker not only exposes self to the carcinogens and toxic particles but all the others near him.”

Activists are also worried that the misinterpreted comparison promotes a philosophy that one might as well smoke because it’s no worse than breathing polluted air.

“This may justify continuation as well as initiation of the smoking habit,” said Dr. Chaturvedi, adding that the argument weakens the resolve of the government, the civil society and public health activists in controlling the tobacco menace.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.