End the deadlock in Nepal

Updated - December 04, 2021 11:41 pm IST

Published - November 07, 2012 12:59 am IST

Since the term of Nepal’s Constituent Assembly (CA) ended in May without the constitution being written, the new republic has been stuck in a political and constitutional deadlock. The government announced fresh elections for a new CA, but the opposition has made Prime Minister Baburam Bhattarai’s resignation a pre-condition for any agreement. The interim constitution does not envisage a second CA poll, and the only way to amend the statute is through the use of special presidential powers which President Ram Baran Yadav has refused to exercise unless there is consensus. The President’s office has emphatically denied allegations that Dr. Yadav, a former Nepali Congress (NC) leader, has flirted with the idea of replacing the Prime Minister to break the impasse. This is reassuring, for any presidential adventurism will be unconstitutional and undemocratic, and would only deepen the political polarisation. It will radicalise the Maoists, who have met their peace process commitments by disbanding the People’s Liberation Army, and are staying within the confines of multi-party democracy. Party chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal ‘Prachanda’ and Dr. Bhattarai have done so at the cost of a radical splinter group accusing them of ‘selling-out’. If the government is dismissed, it can only give ammunition to the ultra-left’s argument that the ‘peace and constitution’ line was a mistake. Any unilateral move by the President would also strengthen the royalists and extreme-right, who are questioning the legitimacy of the interim constitution.

President Yadav is, however, correct in pushing for consensus. Nepal’s political parties have acted irresponsibly by being immersed in short-term power games. They must strike a deal on four inter-related issues — how to preserve the work done by the old CA; new election dates; the election system; and the nature of the government. The final issue remains the trickiest, with both the Maoists and the NC claiming leadership. The core question, of course, is how to ensure a free and fair election and devise a power-sharing arrangement which does not give any side an opportunity to misuse the state apparatus. Several options are on the table — converting the present government into a national unity formation with key ministries, including home, given to the opposition parties; a government headed by a neutral figure and a political cabinet; an acceptable leader from a smaller party becoming Prime Minister. Even as they discuss the exact government composition, Nepal’s politicians should not squander away the gains of the 2006 movement only for leadership of an interim government with a brief tenure and limited mandate. A deal by November-end is essential to hold polls next spring, otherwise the impasse may continue till 2014. It is time to end the deadlock and go back to the people.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.