The power to pardon

Updated - November 29, 2021 01:12 pm IST

Published - March 10, 2015 02:26 am IST

The >release of the Kashmiri separatist leader Masarat Alam by the Mufti Mohammed Sayeed government is not so much a national security crisis as it is a crisis for the relations between the Bharatiya Janata Party and the Peoples Democratic Party. The BJP-led government at the Centre tried to hide its embarrassment at the actions of its ally in Jammu and Kashmir by quickly clarifying that it >does not agree with the freeing of Mr. Alam who spearheaded the stone-throwing protests in 2010 that resulted in the death of more than a hundred persons. While the State government was within its rights to revoke the detention under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act, the discharge of a Hurriyat hardliner who showed no remorse clearly sent the wrong political signals outside of the Valley. Evidently, in an attempt to stem the negative fallout of its alliance with the BJP, the PDP is seeking to cultivate the Muslim secessionist constituency in Kashmir by showing reluctance to concede to the political sensitivities of the Hindutva party. If the PDP is to retain its core base and political influence in the Valley, it would have to be seen as the dominant partner in the alliance, unyielding to the pulls and pressures of the BJP. That Prime Minister Narendra Modi felt compelled to say he did not need lessons in patriotism from the opposition is in itself an indication of the stresses and strains that the BJP has come under following Mr. Alam’s release from jail.

While Chief Minister Mufti Sayeed appears ready to test the limits of the BJP’s patience, Mr. Alam’s release is not going to make a solution to the problems in Jammu and Kashmir any easier. The power to pardon must be used as carefully as the power to punish. In terms of impact, the freeing of Mr. Alam could be of the same order as the hanging of Afzal Guru, which further polarised the political situation, making the search for peace and reconciliation that much more difficult. While a solution that would allow Kashmir to return to normality would have to involve discussions with all sections of the people, and necessarily take on board the secessionists and the hardliners, nothing is to be gained by political one-upmanship whether on the part of the PDP or the BJP. Instead of seeking to annul the release of Mr. Alam, the Central government would be better advised to keep him under close watch. New Delhi must also continue to push for a comprehensive dialogue on a solution to the Kashmir issue taking into account the historical context of the dispute and the continuing democratic aspirations of its people. A comprehensive political solution would in one stroke render gestures such as the release of Mr. Alam truly pointless.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.