Plea to stop sale of poll bonds ahead of Assembly elections

Will increase illegal, illicit funding of political parties, Association for Democratic Reforms tells SC

Published - March 10, 2021 02:33 am IST - NEW DELHI

Supreme Court. File

Supreme Court. File

An NGO, Association for Democratic Reforms, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, has moved an urgent application in the Supreme Court to stop any move to sell electoral bonds prior to the forthcoming Assembly elections in crucial States like West Bengal and Tamil Nadu.

The NGO, also represented by advocate Neha Rathi, voiced serious apprehensions that sale of electoral bonds before elections in States, which also includes Kerala and Assam, would “further increase illegal and illicit funding of political parties through shell companies”.

Its application reminded the court that both the Reserve Bank of India and the Election Commission had objected to the electoral bond scheme.

“Data obtained through RTI has shown that illegal sale windows have been opened in the past to benefit certain political parties... There is a serious apprehension that any further sale of electoral bonds before the upcoming State elections in West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Assam, would further increase illegal and illicit funding of political parties through shell companies,” the NGO submitted.

It said the electoral bonds scheme has “opened doors to unlimited political donations, even from foreign companies and thereby legitimising electoral corruption at a huge scale, while at the same time ensuring complete non-transparency in political funding”.

The government had notified the scheme on January 2, 2018.

It had defended the scheme in the apex court, saying it allowed anonymity to political donors to protect them from “political victimisation”.

The Ministry of Finance affidavit in the top court had dismissed the Election Commission of India’s (ECI) version that the invisibility afforded to benefactors was a “etrogade step” and would wreck transparency in political funding.

The government affidavit had said the shroud of secrecy was a product of “well thought-out policy considerations”. It said the earlier system of cash donations had raised a “concern among the donors that, with their identity revealed, there would be competitive pressure from different political parties receiving donation”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.