Analysis | Is this the beginning of the political demise of Sri Lanka Freedom Party?

With no candidate in fray, Maithripala Sirisena’s party extends support to Gotabaya Rajapaksa in the November 16 presidential election.

October 10, 2019 02:03 am | Updated 02:03 am IST - COLOMBO

 Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena/ File

Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena/ File

President Maithripala Sirisena’s Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP) on Wednesday pledged support to Gotabaya Rajapaksa, candidate of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (People’s Party or SLPP) in the November 16 presidential election.

President Sirisena also “temporarily” stepped down from the position of party leader, as the SLFP appointed senior member and academic Rohana Lakshman Piyadasa as “acting chairman”. The move, according to party seniors, is to allow Mr. Sirisena to “remain neutral” in the run-up to the presidential poll.

The SLFP’s decision to back Gotabaya Rajapaksa — a powerful ex-Defence Secretary and younger brother of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa — was little surprise to Sri Lankans, even as the Rajapaksa camp consolidates political power.

The more significant development for the party — from which Presidents Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, Mahinda Rajapaksa and Maithripala Sirisena rose to the country’s highest office — is that this is the first time that the SLFP is not fielding a candidate in Sri Lanka’s presidential election. Breaking the decades-long contest between the SLFP-United National Party (UNP), the Rajapaksas’ SLPP has emerged as a relatively new, but politically significant player.

Powerful force

Capturing over 40% of the vote share in the February 2018 local government elections, the SLPP emerged a powerful force, pushing the ruling UNP to the second spot, and the SLFP rump — since much of the party joined the Rajapaksas’ SLPP — to a distant third spot.

At this juncture, the SLFP’s future is a major question, according to V. Thanabalasingham, a senior journalist and political commentator.

In his view, the shift began as early as 2015. “When Sirisena took over the leadership of the SLFP after winning presidency in 2015, [Mahinda] Rajapaksa knew that the newly elected President could not consolidate and retain support of the party base,” he told The Hindu .

Over the last five years, the party has been divided between two power centres — one in government [until Mr. Sirisena decided to pull the SLFP out of it in October 2018] and another, led by Mr. Rajapaksa, in Opposition.

“Much of the turbulence in the Sirisena-Ranil [Wickremesinghe] national unity government was also about Sirisena being unable to carry his party along with him, with the constant threat of SLFP-ers shifting loyalty to the Rajapaksa camp,” said Mr. Thanabalasingham

The formation of the SLPP in 2016, and the resurgence of the Rajapaksas, coincided with the growing unpopularity of the ruling coalition, coupled with the current administration’s inability to complete probes into Rajapaksa-era killings and corruption.

In Mr. Thanabalasingham’s view, the question was never “whether” SLFP-ers would eventually gravitate towards the Rajapaksas, and by extension their new party, it was only a question of “when” they will. “The Bandaranaike legacy appears to have lost currency in Sri Lanka today. With Chandrika [Bandaranaike Kumaratunga] also out of mainstream politics, it seems that the Rajapaksa clan has replaced them.”

However, senior political scientist Jayadeva Uyangoda has a different take. The SLFP’s apparently imminent “political demise”, he notes, leaves a massive vacuum in Sri Lanka’s political landscape. The SLFP fashioned itself with a politics of assertive Sinhala-nationalist, post-colonial ideology. “It was a progressive, social democratic, centre-left political party, that made tremendous contribution to social change and democracy.”

The Rajapaksa brand of politics, according to him, has mainly inherited the party’s Sinhala-nationalist assertion, and much less of its economic outlook. “The SLPP today is a right wing, neo-conservative party that favours authoritarianism. Though ironically created by the SLFP, the SLPP doesn’t replace it, it merely displaces it,” Prof. Uyangoda adds. “The SLPP will undoubtedly tread a free market-oriented path but have Mahinda Rajapaksa to disguise its policy in state-capitalist rhetoric.”

It is in this context that the campaigns of the UNP’s Sajith Premadasa and that of Anura Kumara Dissanayake of the leftist JVP have to be viewed. “There is an attempt made by the JVP to reinvent itself as a social democratic party, and by Sajith to re-invent the free market-oriented UNP, projecting a more welfarist-populism. These developments are fascinating,” he says.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.