For Afghan evacuations, Johnson ‘prioritised’ pets

Downing Street denies allegations

Published - January 27, 2022 11:05 pm IST - London

The U.K. government denied on Thursday that embattled Prime Minister Boris Johnson had prioritised pets over people in the chaotic evacuation out of Afghanistan as Kabul fell to the Taliban.

The issue involving a British animal charity fuelled questions about Mr. Johnson’s truthfulness as he awaits an internal inquiry into lockdown-breaching parties that could determine his fate as leader.

After launching its own investigation, London’s Metropolitan Police force was said to be poring over the “partygate” findings by a senior civil servant, holding up the report’s release.

Foreign Ministry emails from August, newly released by a parliamentary committee, showed diplomats referring to a decision taken by Mr. Johnson to evacuate the staff and animals of the Nowzad animal charity.

Mr. Johnson at the time denied insisting on preferential treatment for the charity, which sheltered dogs and cats in Afghanistan and was run by a media-savvy former soldier, Paul “Pen” Farthing.

“Equivalent charity Nowzad, run by an ex-Royal Marine, has received a lot of publicity and the PM has just authorised their staff and animals to be evacuated,” one email said, referring to other charities wanting the same treatment.

‘Afghans left behind’

The rushed nature of the evacuation meant many Afghans, who had served the British in various capacities, were left behind.

The U.K. has been working since to repatriate those it can reach under Taliban control.

Downing Street on Wednesday reiterated Mr. Johnson’s denials about Nowzad in light of the leaked emails, and Defence Secretary Ben Wallace insisted he had been given no order from the Prime Minister to prioritise pets.

“The PM didn’t make any individual decisions about evacuations,” Cabinet Minister Therese Coffey told Sky News on Thursday.

“A lot of people will claim that the PM is involved in supporting their particular pet projects, but the PM said he wasn’t involved in individual decisions,” Ms. Coffey said.

Senior Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat agreed it was possible that some civil servants had exploited Mr. Johnson’s name after his wife Carrie — an animal rights campaigner and friend of Farthing — reportedly intervened.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.