ADVERTISEMENT

Stephen King says no to Musk’s $20 plan for blue check verification on Twitter

November 01, 2022 04:21 pm | Updated 04:21 pm IST

The new Twitter owner Elon Musk replied to King, saying, “We need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How about $8?”

A file photo of author Stephen King | Photo Credit: AP

Popular novelist Stephen King says he has no intention of paying a fee to keep his “verified” check mark on Twitter. The American best-selling author tweeted that he would not pay $20 for his “blue check” and would instead leave Twitter should the policy be enforced.

ADVERTISEMENT

(For insights on emerging themes at the intersection of technology, business and policy, subscribe to our tech newsletter Today’s Cache.)

King was referring to media reports that claim Elon Musk plans to charge $19.99 for the Twitter Blue subscription, and that users who do not subscribe within 90 days would be stripped of their verification marks.

ADVERTISEMENT

At present, verification is free, and Twitter Blue costs $4.99 per month.

On Tuesday, Musk replied to King, saying, “We need to pay the bills somehow! Twitter cannot rely entirely on advertisers. How about $8?”

Musk, a vocal critic of spam bots and trolls on Twitter, promised that he would explain why the feature was the “only way” to eliminate such users.

ADVERTISEMENT

In response to several users who pointed out that the author of numerous best-selling horror novels could easily afford to pay a monthly fee for Twitter verification, King responded that it was a matter of principle.

Other celebrities who have promised to leave Twitter include television screenwriter Shonda Rhimes and singer Toni Braxton.

Stephen King also weighed in on the potential merger of publishers Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster, which was blocked by a federal judge due to fears of harming competition in the book industry.

“I am delighted that Judge Florence Pan has blocked the merger of Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster. The proposed merger was never about readers and writers; it was about preserving (and growing) PRH’s market share. In other words: $$$,” he tweeted on Tuesday.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT