ADVERTISEMENT

Lizard fossil provides the missing link in snake origins

May 18, 2011 11:23 pm | Updated August 23, 2016 12:17 am IST

There is evidence that the body shapes of snakes and limbless lizards evolved independently

The Kerala Mud Snake

Genetic studies suggest that snakes are related to monitor lizards and iguanas, while their anatomy points to amphisbaenians (‘worm lizards'), a group of burrowing lizards with snake-like bodies. The debate has been unresolved — until now.

First evidence

The recent discovery by researchers from the University of Toronto Mississauga and the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany of a tiny, 47 million-year-old fossil of a lizard called

ADVERTISEMENT

Cryptolacerta hassiaca provides the first anatomical evidence that the body shapes of snakes and limbless lizards evolved independently. The findings were reported in

ADVERTISEMENT

Nature .

ADVERTISEMENT

The fossil reveals that amphisbaenians are not closely related to snakes, but instead are related to lacertids, a group of limbed lizards from Europe, Africa and Asia. “This is the sort of study that shows the unique contributions of fossils in understanding evolutionary relationships,” says Professor Robert Reisz from the University of Toronto Mississauga, the senior author of the study. “It is particularly exciting to see that tiny fossil skeletons can answer some really important questions in vertebrate evolution.”

“This fossil refutes the theory that snakes and other burrowing reptiles share a common ancestry and reveals that their body shapes evolved independently,” says lead author Professor Johannes Müller of Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.

The German research team, led by Müller and American graduate student Christy Hipsley, used X-ray computed tomography to reveal the detailed anatomy of the lizard's skull and combined the anatomy of

ADVERTISEMENT

Cryptolacerta and other lizards with DNA from living lizards and snakes to analyze relationships.

ADVERTISEMENT

The results

Their results showed that Cryptolacerta shared a thickened, reinforced skull with worm lizards and that both were most closely related to lacertids, while snakes were related to monitor lizards like the living Komodo dragons, according to a University of Toronto Mississauga press release.

Even though snakes and amphisbaeans separately evolved their elongate, limbless bodies, the discovery of Cryptolacerta reveals the early stages in the evolution of burrowing in lizards. By comparing Cryptolactera to living lizards with known lifestyles, co-author and U of T Mississauga paleontologist Jason Head determined that the animal likely inhabited leaf-litter environments and was an opportunistic burrower.

Cryptolacerta shows us the early ecology of one of the most unique and specialized lizard groups, and also reveals the sequence of anatomical adaptations leading to amphisbaenians and their burrowing lifestyle,” says Head. “Based on this discovery, it appears worm-lizards evolved head first.”

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT