India, for long, has been extremely circumspect about legalising euthanasia (OpEd page – ‘Yes, No, It’s Complicated – “Should euthanasia be allowed?” January 26). A key reason could be concern over its misuse, but it is a line of thinking that is hardly convincing. In the Aruna Ramachandra Shanbaug case, the Supreme Court of India did not allow passive euthanasia despite the fact that she had been suffering for years. To dispel fears, a central agency can be constituted to thoroughly examine such a patient and submit its report on whether or not his or hers is a fit case for euthanasia. With a rise in numbers of those ailing for years, there is a need to consider the issue.
V. Lakshmanan,
Tirupur, Tamil Nadu
ADVERTISEMENT
I think most of the concern arises from the worry about euthanasia being misused. However, in cases where the person is severely disabled and has been enduring pain and suffering, euthanasia can be considered to be an option. There must be peace of mind and not distress. It can also help the person’s loved ones come to terms with the person’s state rather than continue to be stricken by his or her suffering.
Meenakshy Menon,
Kochi
ADVERTISEMENT
India has still miles to go in comparison with the West on this issue. For instance, who in India will certify the critical nature of an illness which demands euthanasia? Are there acceptable parameters? The answer is no.
Moreover, amazing developments in the field of medical science offer new hope to such patients who were once considered to be a lost cause. What should cause concern is the fact that research in medical science itself could come to a grinding halt if euthanasia becomes legally acceptable. Another cause for worry is the danger of there being ulterior motives in wanting someone to be subject to euthanasia.
Maneesh V.P.,
Iriveri, Kannur, Kerala