ADVERTISEMENT

HC orders probe in R.S. Pura rape

Published - April 19, 2018 10:17 pm IST - Srinagar

High Court says two officials had suppressed fact in a report submitted to it

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) local leader Chaudhary Lal Singh, who has resigned from the state cabinet over the Kathua rape and murder case of an eight-year-old girl, leads a rally in support of a new probe led by the federal Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), in Jammu on April 19, 2018. Eight men accused of raping and murdering an eight-year-old girl pleaded not guilty April 16 to the horrific crime that has sparked revulsion and brought thousands to India's streets in protest. / AFP PHOTO / SAJJAD HUSSAIN

The J&K High Court on Thursday ordered an investigation against two officials in a case of illegal confinement and rape of a 15-year-old girl at R.S. Pura in Jammu in August.

A prosecuting officer and an assistant sub-inspector (ASI) will face the investigation.

“The prosecuting officer and the ASI in-charge of the R.S. Pura police station have suppressed a material fact in the report submitted to the court. They have not stated anywhere in the report that the victim, in her statement, had recorded that the accused compelled her to submit herself to the sexual lust and desire of three persons, who forcibly raped her for a long time,” held Justices M.K. Hanjura and Dhiraj Singh Thakur.

ADVERTISEMENT

Justice Hanjura directed the Director-General of Police, J&K, to conduct an inquiry into the role of the officers and submit a report within four weeks.

The victim left school at 1.30 p.m. for home on August 22. A vehicle with eight or nine passengers stopped her. “One of them was wielding a gun. They dashed her schoolbag onto the ground and forcibly pushed her into the vehicle. She was put up in a shed in a forest area,” according to the investigation reports.

The probe suggests the victim was forced to marry one of the accused.

ADVERTISEMENT

Forced statement

It is alleged that on September 11, 2017, she was forced to make a statement before the court that she was in love with one of the accused and wanted to marry him. “However, in the court, she narrated the entire episode to the presiding officer. She said she did not want to marry the accused and was brought to the court to make a false statement,” said the report.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT