ADVERTISEMENT

When are you coming back, HC asks Mallya

Updated - March 01, 2019 10:33 pm IST

Published - March 01, 2019 10:31 pm IST - Mumbai

Tycoon has challenged ‘fugitive’ tag

Vijay Mallya, founder and chairman of Kingfisher Airlines Ltd., stands outside during a break in his extradition hearing at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, U.K., on Monday, Dec. 10, 2018. The source of Mallya's legal problems is about $1.3 billion in loans that he took out in India for the now defunct Kingfisher Airlines Ltd., which he founded in 2005 and shut down seven years later. Photographer: Jason Alden/Bloomberg

The Bombay High Court on Friday asked the advocate appearing for liquor baron Vijay Mallya, “The tag of ‘fugitive’ will go away once you come back. So when is that happening.”

A Division Bench of Justices I Mahanty and SV Kotwal was hearing an appeal filed by Mr. Mallya challenging being declared a fugitive economic offender (FEO).

On January 5, the special FEO court declared him a first FEO under the new law. On June 22, 2018, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) had filed an application at the PMLA court to declare Mr. Mallya a FEO and sought orders to confiscate all his properties estimated to be around ₹12,500 crore.

ADVERTISEMENT

On June 30, 2018 the PMLA court took cognisance of the application filed by the agency. On March 13, 2019, the special court will hear the second part of the application by ED, on the confiscation of properties and the intervenors will also be heard.

‘Draconian Act’

Senior counsel Amit Desai appearing for Mr. Mallya said every defaulter of a bank loan is not a criminal and called the FEO Act draconian.

ADVERTISEMENT

He said Mr. Mallya is willing to pay the entire loan but by declaring him a FEO his assets will be confiscated which will harm the creditors.

The court said, “The tag will go away as soon as your client comes back and faces legal proceedings here. Once he comes back, the property too will be released...So, when is that happening?”

Mr. Desai said Mr. Mallya wants to return and had made this clear earlier too but he is unable to, as a UK court had prohibited him from returning.

“The court has limited his movement. It is like a bail condition.”

At this, the court said, “You can volunteer to return. Have you ever gone to the English court and said you want to return (to India) and face pending proceedings?”

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT