ADVERTISEMENT

High Court insists on conducting T.N. judicial service examination every year to reduce vacancies and also pendency of cases

Published - August 01, 2023 10:24 pm IST - CHENNAI

Justices S. Vaidyanathan and K. Rajasekar take serious note of almost 300 vacancies existing in the cadre of Civil Judge in Tamil Nadu and cases as old as 30 years still pending adjudication

The litigants had contended that the last recruitment to the post of Civil Judge was conducted in 2018 and that there was a long gap since then.

Taking serious note of almost 300 vacancies existing in the cadre of Civil Judge in the subordinate judiciary in the State and cases as old as 30 years still pending adjudication, the Madras High Court has impressed upon the need for conducting judicial service examinations every year without a break.

ADVERTISEMENT

Justices S. Vaidyanathan and K. Rajasekar said only if the recruitment process was conducted year on year, the pending litigations could be minimized and also the complaints related to deprivation of promotion to eligible civil judges as sub-judges and sub-judges as district judges could be addressed.

The observations were made while dismissing a batch of writ petitions filed by a group of aspirants to the post of Civil Judge. The petitioners had challenged the recruitment notification issued by Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission on June 1 this year for recruiting 245 Civil Judges in the State.

ADVERTISEMENT

The litigants had contended that the last recruitment to the post of Civil Judge was conducted in 2018 and that there was a long gap since then. The further claimed that the eligibility conditions imposed under the present recruitment notification had made them ineligible to apply for the post.

However, not finding any reason to entertain their plea, the second Division Bench said it did not want to interfere with the recruitment notification in the absence of any arbitrariness and especially when the written examination for the post of Civil Judge was scheduled to be held on August 18.

“Due to Covid pandemic, no selection process to the judicial service had taken place and if the plea of the petitioners is accepted now, it would amount to opening a pandora’s box and several other similarly placed candidates would start knocking at the doors of this court with the similar demand and in that case, recruitment will turn out to be a never ending process,” the Bench wrote.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT