ADVERTISEMENT

'Aarakshan' neither anti-Dalit nor anti-quota: plea in court

August 12, 2011 11:31 am | Updated November 17, 2021 12:35 am IST - New Delhi

Bahujan Samaj Party activists protest against the film, Aarakshan, at a cinema in Thane on Friday. But the screening of the film in several cinemas in Mumbai went on smoothly.

Producer-director Prakash Jha has moved the Supreme Court challenging the ban on the release of his film Aarakshan in Uttar Pradesh and Punjab and suspension of its exhibition in Andhra Pradesh

Though a mention was made before a Bench headed by Justice Altamas Kabir for urgent hearing of the petition on Friday itself, the Registry, after the completion of formalities, has listed it for August 16.

The petitioner said the Hindi film, starring Amitabh Bachchan, Saif Ali Khan and Deepika Padukone, was given a U/A certificate by the Central Board of Film Certification for release all over India. The impugned order issued by the three States was based on an apprehension that the film was likely to hurt the feelings of weaker sections and lead to agitations, causing a breach of the peace and tranquillity.

ADVERTISEMENT

Denying the charge that the film was anti-Dalit, the petitioner said he was always compassionate to the cause of that caste and it was amply demonstrated in his films. “Aarakshan uses the issue of reservation only as a landscape or backdrop on which the story and journey of the protagonist, who is the principal of an institution, is based. The film highlights commercialisation of the education system in the present society. It is not anti-reservation and/or anti-Dalit.”

Mr. Jha said, “Freedom of expression is constitutionally protected and cannot be held to ransom by an intolerant group of people.”

The petitioner said the Supreme Court, in its judgment in the case of the Tamil film, Orae oru gramathile, observed that open criticism of government policies and operations was not a ground for restricting the freedom of expression and “we must practise tolerance of the views of others.” He said, “Intolerance is as much dangerous to democracy as to the person himself.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Any restraint on exhibition of Aarakshan, certified for public exhibition in accordance with the Cinematograph Act, would violate his fundamental right to speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (a).

The petitioner said Rs. 65 crore was already spent on production, publicity and marketing, and third-party rights for distribution and exploitation had been created. He sought quashing of the ban orders and a direction to the three States to provide police protection for the screening of the film.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT