Corporate Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid on Tuesday said that lobbying and public relations are part of the democratic set-up but cautioned against their use to subvert corporate governance.
“When you talk of lobbying, PR, these are areas that are part of the democratic system. Their illegitimate use, their use to subvert corporate governance is something that we should certainly look at,” Mr. Khurshid said on the sidelines of the ‘India Corporate Week’ event in New Delhi.
The Minister’s comments come in the backdrop of the leakage of conversations of corporate lobbyist Niira Radia with politicians, corporates and media personalities which have stirred a controversy.
ADVERTISEMENT
Lobbying is a legitimate business in countries like the U.S., however, opined Diljeet Titus, senior partner of law firm Titus & Co, “is not recognised in India in statutory or non-statutory form.”
On the other hand, he said, “lobbying, which basically means influencing government decisions externally, could invite Prevention of Corruption Act and may also go against the service rules for bureaucrats“.
Lalit Bhasin, managing partner, Bhasin & Co, said, “in the U.S. lobbying is not only for corporates, but also for appointing judges. It is a flourishing industry there, a recognised mode of canvassing... In India, it is a developing phenomena like the Public Relations.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He added that lobbying, which is an act of trying to influence government leaders, is not seen as good corporate practice in India.
Earlier in the day, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said that he has asked Cabinet Secretary K. M. Chandrasekhar to look into the issue of telephone tapping and suggest measures within a month to prevent the leakages of recorded conversations outside the government.
Mr. Khurshid said that Dr. Singh’s statement should come as an assurance to industry that their privacy will be protected.
“(The) PM has made it very clear what the position is and corporates should be reassured that there is no question of hiding anything, running away and not explicitly and transparently explaining why what is done and the extent to which privacy has to be protected and information has to be protected,” Mr. Khurshid said.