ADVERTISEMENT

Uncertainty ends in Sri Lanka’s Northern Province

June 19, 2017 09:45 pm | Updated June 20, 2017 07:53 am IST - Colombo

CM Wigneswaran, leader Sampanthan reach understanding

In this August 22, 2014 file photo, R. Sampanthan, Srilankan Member of Parliament and Leader of Tamil National Alliance in New Delhi.

Chief Minister of Sri Lanka’s Northern Province C.V. Wigneswaran will continue in the post following an understanding with Tamil National Alliance leader R. Sampanthan, days after a large bloc of governing council members withdrew support.

On Monday, the Chief Minister agreed to reverse his controversial directive to two provincial ministers that Mr. Sampanthan had earlier objected to. Following negotiations, Mr. Sampanthan told the Northern Province Governor that the Council members would withdraw their motion of no-confidence. “All’s well that ends well,” the TNA veteran said in a letter addressed to the CM. Mr. Sampanthan also called for an early meeting with the CM “to further discuss all issues”.

The Tamil leaders had clashed over the CM’s response to a recent inquiry that found two of his cabinet ministers guilty of corruption charges. Apart from urging them to resign, Mr. Wigneswaran asked two other Ministers, who were not found guilty, to go on leave to facilitate further inquiry – a move that Mr. Sampathan found unreasonable and going against natural justice.

ADVERTISEMENT

CM backs off

The CM’s decision provoked as many as 21 members of the 38-member council to withdraw their support to him last week, putting the future of the first council of Sri Lanka’s Northern Province, elected to power in 2013, at stake. Of the dissenting members, 15 were from the Ilankai Tamil Arasu Katchi (ITAK), the key TNA constituent that both Mr. Sampanthan and Mr. Wigneswaran are members of. After exchanging at least three rounds of letters with Mr. Sampanthan, the CM said he “would not insist on the conditions relating to leave,” at the same time stressing that the ministers should not interfere in a future legal inquiry.

While the recent controversy centred on the inquiry, it reflected the simmering disgruntlement within a section of the Council, particularly among ITAK members, who felt neglected. It is yet another manifestation of the widening political differences between Mr. Sampanthan and the CM he hand-picked in 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have achieved our objective in letting the CM know that most us don’t have confidence in him any more,” an ITAK member in Jaffna said, requesting anonymity. “But we appreciate our Leader’s view that this must be resolved,” he said, allaying rumours of a possible split in the TNA.

TNA parliamentarian and ITAK spokesman M.A. Sumanthiran said the apparent differences among constituents only pointed to the “healthy democracy” within the Alliance, which is an amalgam of four parties. Observing that an impending legal inquiry was a “satisfactory outcome”, he said: “this is not the end of the matter. Or Leader [Mr. Sampanthan] has said he would discuss other pending issues.”

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT