ADVERTISEMENT

French feminists say ‘Rights of Man’ declaration is sexist

May 21, 2015 10:55 pm | Updated 10:56 pm IST - Paris:

“The expression ‘Rights of Man’ makes women, their issues and their battles invisible and we become more and more isolated”

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, or Declaration of Human and Civic Rights is a fundamental document of the French Revolution and in the history of human rights, defining the individual and collective rights of all the estates of the realm as universal.

A group of French feminists are saying no to the rights of man, which they say is sexist and an outdated example of the French exception culturelle.

The Droits Humains collective is calling on France to stop leaving women out of the idea of universal liberties.

The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (

ADVERTISEMENT

Droits de l’Homme in French) was approved by the national assembly in 1789 at the time of the French revolution.

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Human rights for everyone’
The collective wants the French government to immediately abandon the term “Droits de l’Homme” and has launched a petition calling for “human rights for everyone”.

“It is past the time to be debating or arguing about the relevance of this change of terminology, which is self-evident,” the petition says. “This group will disband once the institutions of the French Republic have made tangible changes. Otherwise, it will remain active for as long as necessary.” The group says countries including Spain, Italy and Germany and French-speaking parts of Canada and Switzerland have already dropped use of the term.

“The expression ‘Rights of Man’ makes women, their issues and their battles invisible and we become more and more isolated,” NoE Le Blanc, from the collective, told

ADVERTISEMENT

Le Parisien . The preamble to the 1789 declaration mentions “Rights of Man” three times, and the words “men” or “man” are used in four of the declaration’s 17 articles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Valentine Zuber, a French specialist in history and human rights, said the term was chosen “specifically and without ambiguity to be male and exclude women”.

The 1791 French constitution made women “passive citizens” excluded from voting, as they were treated in Britain and throughout the Europe at the time (Sweden had allowed taxpaying female members of city guilds to vote in 1718, but rescinded this in its 1771 constitution). French women got the vote in October 1945.

Critics’ stance Critics of the petition argue that the term “Homme” when capitalised denotes mankind, as in everyone. The feminists retort that the capital H is rarely used when written and cannot be distinguished at all when spoken.

The French declaration inspired the United Nations universal declaration of human rights in 1948.

Catherine Coutelle, a Socialist MP, said: “France is the only country that has translated “human rights” as “rights of man” for the United Nations universal declaration.” She said it was a regrettable example of the “French exception”.

“Abandoning the use of this expression would be a step towards ending the discriminatory logic within the French language itself,” Coutelle said. She also regretted the continued and common use of titles such as Madame le Maire and Madame le President, where the masculine noun always takes the masculine article even if the holder of the position is feminine.

Paris’s Socialist mayor, Anne Hidalgo, the first woman to hold the prestigious post, insists on being called the grammatically incorrect Madame la Maire.— © Guardian Newspapers Limited, 2015

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT