ADVERTISEMENT

Court rejects plea seeking Satyendar Jain’s suspension from Cabinet

Updated - July 28, 2022 02:05 pm IST

Published - July 28, 2022 01:44 am IST - NEW DELHI:

It is for CM to consider whether he continues as Minister: HC

Satyendar Jain | Photo Credit: FILE PHOTO

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday rejected a plea to suspend Delhi Minister Satyendar Jain from the Cabinet following his arrest in a money laundering case, saying it was for the Chief Minister to consider whether a person charged with such offences should be allowed to continue as a Minister.

ADVERTISEMENT

Within hours of the High Court’s observation, the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which is probing the alleged money laundering case against Mr. Jain, filed a chargesheet before a trial court here.

The trial court has posted the matter for further hearing on July 29.

ADVERTISEMENT

The High Court’s judgment came on a petition by former BJP MLA Nand Kishore Garg seeking a direction to the Lieutenant-Governor to initiate proceedings to suspend Mr. Jain, who is in custody since May 30.

The petitioner had earlier said that Mr. Jain was arrested over his alleged involvement in hawala transactions in 2015-2016 with a Kolkata-based firm. As Mr. Jain is a public servant sworn to a constitutional oath to uphold the rule of law in the interest of the public, the petitioner argued that the AAP leader could not be permitted to hold his office as a Minister as he had committed a breach of his constitutional oath.

‘Not in Constitution’

A Bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said whether a breach of oath fulfils a ground for disqualification of a Minister is not mentioned in Article 164 (1) of the Constitution.

“The Council of Ministers has a collective responsibility to sustain and uphold the integrity of the Constitution of India and it is for the Chief Minister to act in the best interest of the State and consider whether a person who has a criminal background and/or has been charged with offences involving moral turpitude should be appointed and should be allowed to continue as a Minister or not,” a Bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said.

(With inputs from PTI)

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT