ADVERTISEMENT

NRIs face heat, housing plans thrown off gear

November 20, 2016 12:00 am | Updated December 02, 2016 04:34 pm IST - New Delhi

: The aftershocks of demonetisation, non-resident Indians (NRIs) continuing their association with the Capital complain, are as severe for them as for their relatives back home.

Though they may not be queuing up outside banks to exchange or withdraw money, those in the process of building, or maintaining, property in NCR find themselves in the same boat due to the sudden crunch in liquidity which came in effect with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s announcement on November 8.

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Ripple effect’

ADVERTISEMENT

From missing construction instalments and maintenance payments to local builders to being refused delivery of merchandise including wedding invitation cards and wardrobe items from businesses based here, demonetisation in the Capital, they claimed, is having a negative ripple effect on the housing plans of many Indians based in Dubai and marriages to be solemnised in the United Kingdom.

“I paid a builder Rs. 2 lakh in cash for modifications to a family property at Noida. Now, the builder is refusing to hand over the possession of the property to a local relative of mine till I wire him the same amount,” complained Nirmal Khanna, 55, an NRI based in Sharjah.

ADVERTISEMENT

In a mess

ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Khanna said he was now running from pillar to post to get his hands on enough cash, including taxes, to pay the builder in question, who had assured him that he would give him the entire cash amount along with the possession of the property but was threatening to involve him in litigation if the amount wasn't electronically disbursed to him within a certain deadline.

Anoop Wahi, 58, a UK-based banker, complained his flat in Gurgaon had missed its monthly maintenance because he had “made the mistake” of trusting his neighbour with an advance cash payment meant for the purpose during his visit to the country last week.

“I've recently got the possession of the property and, because of lack of time, had decided to leave the first and substantial maintenance payment behind with my neighbour to pay on my behalf a few days ago; the owner of the building is also now insisting that I electronically disburse the amount to him which I do not have the means to in such a short time frame,” Mr. Wahi said.

Meanwhile, Kumudhini Anand, 56, from London complained that a Karol Bagh-based wardrobe wholesaler was refusing to despatch an expensive shipment of clothes which she had paid for in cash during her recent trip to the Capital.

This is a Premium article available exclusively to our subscribers. To read 250+ such premium articles every month
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
You have exhausted your free article limit.
Please support quality journalism.
The Hindu operates by its editorial values to provide you quality journalism.
This is your last free article.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT