Siddharth Chowdhury’s The Patna Manual of Style has made it to the shortlist for The Hindu Prize 2015. for, as the judges put it, “its “impish humour, high readability and understanding of small-town life” in India. Chowdhury navigates plots and storylines, characters and quirks, in the same way that one would navigate the bylanes of a familiar landscape. Experimenting with both style and form, he gives us a book that plucks at notes of nostalgia and dark, honest humour. Excerpts from the interview:
When I first read The Patna Manual of Style , I realised that the title itself was fluid. It says stories, but it’s not that simple, is it? They aren’t disconnected stories, but at the same time, they are. You have worked with a style that’s hard to slot. Could you talk about that?
Well I think
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The title refers to the Patna code of living which the characters bring to Delhi. And not to upturned collars and safari suits.
Tell us about creating Hriday Thakur and his world? How much of autobiographical material went into him?
With Hriday Thakur I needed a character who was less of an idealist than Ritwik Ray, the hero of
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Well like I have said before, the trajectory of my stories is autobiographical but after that it is pure storytelling and various axes to grind.
How was it, returning to him after Day Scholar ? To pick up on his life and where it was going?
Very easy in fact as Hriday never left me. I started ‘The Importer of Blondes’, the long opening story where we meet Hriday again, soon after Day Scholar was published. But with this book, I wanted Hriday to be mellower, more contemplative, less angular.
You could say the protagonist is Hriday in most stories, but really, your protagonists seem to be the places you write about, the environment which seems just as alive and important. Would you agree?
Yes, I would. Patna and Delhi are two places where I have grown up and know intimately. And I love writing about them. The Patna Manual of Style , inspite of its title, is actually a Delhi book in many ways.
Could you talk about your own process of writing itself? How do you go about it? In bursts and waves, or with a regular, scheduled discipline?
Well, I write very slowly and do many drafts. At least five to six drafts per section. In writing, as in life, I am an advocate of the rhythm method. I usually write very early in the morning and on Sundays. But sometimes months go by when I do not write. Usually, if I start something I finish it.
Now, with the book shortlisted for The Hindu Prize, do you look at it with a new eye? A perspective that takes into account the fact that it was read by a team of judges and loved for the meaning they read into it?
Well, I am delighted. It is a wonderful shortlist to be on. It has on it writers whom I have admired ever since I started writing. It is a validation no doubt. This wasn’t an easy book to write and I am sure it is not easy on the readers either. As a standard issue David in a list full of Goliaths I am looking forward to the outcome with much glee.
You yourself haven’t really done the lit fest rounds. In a way, you’ve almost entirely steered clear of them, except for one, I think. Why is that? And is it going to change?
Well, there is no hard and fast rule really. But the fact remains that I am inordinately lazy and do not enjoy doing readings.
The Patna Manual of Style; Siddharth Chowdhury, Aleph, Rs.295.